Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-12 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> >> Doesn't InfluxDB do the same? > > InfluxDB stores timeseries data primarily. > > > > Gnocchi in intended to store strongly-typed OpenStack resource > > representations (instance, images, etc.) in addition to providing > > a means to access timeseries data associated with those resources. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Sandy Walsh
On 8/11/2014 6:49 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> Hi Eoghan, >> >> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does >> not >> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. >> Many >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> >> On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > Hi Eoghan, > > Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does > not > cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. > Many > folks feel that this technology is a via

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2014-08-11 5:13 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote: Right, I'm not suggesting to remove the storage abstraction layer. I'm just curious what gnocchi does better/different than InfluxDB? I was at the OpenStack Design Summit when Gnocchi was presented. Soon after the basic goals and technical details of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Sandy Walsh
On 8/11/2014 5:29 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > >> On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Hi Eoghan, Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many folks feel that thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > > >> Hi Eoghan, > >> > >> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not > >> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. > >> Many > >> folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for t

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Sandy Walsh
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > >> Hi Eoghan, >> >> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not >> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many >> folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space >> d

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Eoghan Glynn
> Hi Eoghan, > > Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not > cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many > folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space > discussed below. Great question Brad! As it ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Brad Topol
Hi Eoghan, Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not cover is why InfluxDB (http://influxdb.com/) is not being leveraged. Many folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space discussed below. Thanks, Brad Brad Topol, Ph.D. IBM Di