Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Clint Byrum
at 13:41:00 > To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] > glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG > > > Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300: > > > Hello! > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Thomas Herve
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: [snip] > Any attempt at versioning that is not git, will frustrate any git user. > This cat's already out of the bag, but I'd suggest adding git repositories > as a blob container type and finding a way to allow git to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG > Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300: > > Hello! > > > > > > Let me quickly describe my vision of the problem. I asked this question to > > Brian last F

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300: > Hello! > > > Let me quickly describe my vision of the problem. I asked this question to > Brian last Friday, because it is evident that the projects have the > intersection in functionality. For this reason, I proposed to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Monty Taylor
: openstack-dev <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] > glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG > >> Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2017-02-10 12:39:11 -0500: >>> I want to give all interested parties a he

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: February 13, 2017 at 10:14:24 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG > On 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300 (+0300), Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > [...] > > Almost every project works with some binary data and must store it > > somewhe

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300 (+0300), Mikhail Fedosin wrote: [...] > Almost every project works with some binary data and must store it > somewhere, and almost always storage itself is not the part of the > project's mission. This issue has often been neglected. For this reason > there is no

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Hello! Let me quickly describe my vision of the problem. I asked this question to Brian last Friday, because it is evident that the projects have the intersection in functionality. For this reason, I proposed to bring Glare back and develop it as a new generation of Glance service. Perhaps such

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 13/02/17 14:37 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Brian Rosmaita wrote: I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning (February 23). [...] Thanks for setting this meeting up. I'll be there! Ditto! I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Ian Cordasco
openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG > Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2017-02-10 12:39:11 -0500: > > I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a > > session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-13 Thread Thierry Carrez
Brian Rosmaita wrote: > I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a > session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning > (February 23). > [...] Thanks for setting this meeting up. I'll be there! -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-12 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2017-02-10 12:39:11 -0500: > I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a > session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning > (February 23). > > Here's what we need to discuss. This is from my perspective as

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

2017-02-12 Thread Tim Bell
Although there has not been much discussion on this point on the mailing list, I feel we do need to find the right level of granularity for ‘mainstream’ projects: For CERN, we look for the following before offering a project to our end users: - Distro packaging (in our case RPMs through RDO) -