at 13:41:00
> To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all]
> glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG
>
> > Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300:
> > > Hello!
> >
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
[snip]
> Any attempt at versioning that is not git, will frustrate any git user.
> This cat's already out of the bag, but I'd suggest adding git repositories
> as a blob container type and finding a way to allow git to
openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all]
glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG
> Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300:
> > Hello!
> >
> >
> > Let me quickly describe my vision of the problem. I asked this question to
> > Brian last F
Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300:
> Hello!
>
>
> Let me quickly describe my vision of the problem. I asked this question to
> Brian last Friday, because it is evident that the projects have the
> intersection in functionality. For this reason, I proposed to
: openstack-dev <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all]
> glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG
>
>> Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2017-02-10 12:39:11 -0500:
>>> I want to give all interested parties a he
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: February 13, 2017 at 10:14:24
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [ope
t;openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all]
glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG
> On 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300 (+0300), Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
> [...]
> > Almost every project works with some binary data and must store it
> > somewhe
On 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300 (+0300), Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
[...]
> Almost every project works with some binary data and must store it
> somewhere, and almost always storage itself is not the part of the
> project's mission. This issue has often been neglected. For this reason
> there is no
Hello!
Let me quickly describe my vision of the problem. I asked this question to
Brian last Friday, because it is evident that the projects have the
intersection in functionality. For this reason, I proposed to bring Glare
back and develop it as a new generation of Glance service. Perhaps such
On 13/02/17 14:37 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Brian Rosmaita wrote:
I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a
session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning
(February 23).
[...]
Thanks for setting this meeting up. I'll be there!
Ditto! I'm
openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all]
glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG
> Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2017-02-10 12:39:11 -0500:
> > I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a
> > session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on
Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a
> session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning
> (February 23).
> [...]
Thanks for setting this meeting up. I'll be there!
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Excerpts from Brian Rosmaita's message of 2017-02-10 12:39:11 -0500:
> I want to give all interested parties a heads up that I have scheduled a
> session in the Macon room from 9:30-10:30 a.m. on Thursday morning
> (February 23).
>
> Here's what we need to discuss. This is from my perspective as
Although there has not been much discussion on this point on the mailing list,
I feel we do need to find the right level of granularity for ‘mainstream’
projects:
For CERN, we look for the following before offering a project to our end users:
- Distro packaging (in our case RPMs through RDO)
-
14 matches
Mail list logo