Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

hi, just so it doesn't seem like you're replying to nobody. i want to thank all of you for opening up on this topic which hopefully isn't only important to me alone. it really helped me with my voting beyond the people i know. i apologise if this was a polarising topic but it was great to see

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: gordon chung [mailto:g...@live.ca] &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On 10/03/2016 11:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: > hi, > > as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a > question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch > in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the > candidates for those who

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: > hi, > > as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a > question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch > in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On 2016-10-03 15:30:56 + (+), gordon chung wrote: [...] > the TC has historically been a reactive council that lets others ask for > change and acts as the final approver. do you believe the TC should be a > proactive committee that initiates change and if yes, to what scope? I view the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016, at 08:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: > the TC has historically been a reactive council that lets others ask for > change and acts as the final approver. do you believe the TC should be a > proactive committee that initiates change and if yes, to what scope? > more generally,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

Excerpts from John Dickinson's message of 2016-10-03 14:26:00 -0700: > > On 3 Oct 2016, at 12:31, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > I think that's the balance we want to > > have: listen to input, collect information, then clearly set the > > direction without over-prescribing the implementation. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016, gordon chung wrote: the TC has historically been a reactive council that lets others ask for change and acts as the final approver. do you believe the TC should be a proactive committee that initiates change and if yes, to what scope? more generally, what are some specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On 3 Oct 2016, at 12:31, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > I think that's the balance we want to > have: listen to input, collect information, then clearly set the > direction without over-prescribing the implementation. In light of this statement, would you reevaluate previous decisions you've made

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: > hi, > > as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a > question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch > in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2016-10-03 15:30:56 +: > hi, > > as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a > question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch > in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

gordon chung wrote: hi, as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the candidates for those who haven't voted yet. obviously, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

> -Original Message- > From: gordon chung [mailto:g...@live.ca] > Sent: Monday, October 03, 2016 11:31 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates > > hi, > > as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 03:30:56PM +, gordon chung wrote: > > > the TC has historically been a reactive council that lets others ask for > change and acts as the final approver. do you believe the TC should be a > proactive committee that initiates change and if yes, to what scope? > more

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On Oct 3, 2016, at 10:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: > the TC has historically been a reactive council that lets others ask for > change and acts as the final approver. do you believe the TC should be a > proactive committee that initiates change and if yes, to what scope? > more

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2016-10-03 15:30:56 +: > hi, > > as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a > question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch > in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] open question to the candidates

On 16-10-03 11:30 AM, gordon chung wrote: hi, as there are many candidates this TC election, i figured i'd ask a question to better understand the candidates from the usual sales pitch in self-nominations. hopefully, this will give some insights into the candidates for those who haven't voted