On 30/05/14 02:08, James Slagle wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
As I was reviewing this patch today:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96160/
It occurred to me that the tuskar project is part of the tripleo
program:
On 30.5.2014 11:06, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
On 30/05/14 02:08, James Slagle wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
As I was reviewing this patch today:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96160/
It occurred to me that the tuskar project is part of the
On 2014/30/05 02:08, James Slagle wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
As I was reviewing this patch today:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96160/
It occurred to me that the tuskar project is part of the tripleo
program:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:25:02PM -0400, Anita Kuno wrote:
As I was reviewing this patch today:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96160/
It occurred to me that the tuskar project is part of the tripleo
program:
- Original Message -
From: Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Friday, 30 May, 2014 12:04:29 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleO] Should #tuskar business be conducted
in the #tripleo channel?
I'd say yes. I don't think the additional
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
As I was reviewing this patch today:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96160/
It occurred to me that the tuskar project is part of the tripleo
program:
