Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Oh, I see it got already split (not in this patch)! Excellent. Thanks for striking me Jay, it actually helped. Many thanks! -- Jarda On 17/04/15 16:00, Jay Dobies wrote: Have you seen Dan's first steps towards splitting the overcloud image building out of devtest_overcloud? It's not the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Jay Dobies
Have you seen Dan's first steps towards splitting the overcloud image building out of devtest_overcloud? It's not the same thing that you're talking about, but it might be a step in that direction. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173645/ On 04/17/2015 09:50 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Arkady_Kanevsky
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential We need an ability for an Admin to add/remove new images at will to deploy new overcloud images at any time. Expect that it is standard glance functionality. -Original Message- From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, April 17,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Arkady_Kanevsky
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential If images under consideration are for overcloud nodes then they will changing all the time also. It all depends on which layer you are working on. Just consider images for overcloud nodes as a cloud application, and then follow rules you would apply to any

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Building images separation and moving images into right place at right time

2015-04-17 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hey Arkady, yes, this should stay as fundamental requirement. This is tandard Glance functionality, I just want to separate discover and deploy images since these will not be very likely subject of change and they belong into undercloud installation stage. That's why I want to separate