Re: [openstack-dev] DeployArtifacts considered...complicated?

2018-06-28 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 05:17:36PM +0200, Jiří Stránský wrote: > For the puppet modules specifically, we might also add another > directory+mount into the docker-puppet container, which would be blank by > default (unlike the existing, already populated /etc/puppet and >

Re: [openstack-dev] DeployArtifacts considered...complicated?

2018-06-28 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:12:54AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > -1 to more services. We take a Heat time penalty for each new > composable service we add and in this case I don't think this should > be a service itself. I think for this case, it would be better suited > as a host prep task than a

Re: [openstack-dev] DeployArtifacts considered...complicated?

2018-06-19 Thread Alex Schultz
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > On 19.6.2018 16:29, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: >>> >>> Is this the same issue Carlos is trying to fix via >>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494517/ ? >> >> >> That

Re: [openstack-dev] DeployArtifacts considered...complicated?

2018-06-19 Thread Jiří Stránský
On 19.6.2018 16:29, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: Is this the same issue Carlos is trying to fix via https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494517/ ? That solves part of the problem, but it's not a complete solution. In particular, it

Re: [openstack-dev] DeployArtifacts considered...complicated?

2018-06-19 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > Is this the same issue Carlos is trying to fix via > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/494517/ ? That solves part of the problem, but it's not a complete solution. In particular, it doesn't solve the problem that bit me: if you're

Re: [openstack-dev] DeployArtifacts considered...complicated?

2018-06-18 Thread Steven Hardy
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote: > I've been working on a series of patches to enable support for > keystone federation in tripleo. I've been making good use of the > DeployArtifacts support for testing puppet modules...until today. > > I have some patches that teach