Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Peter Portante
Hi Sean, Given the swift failure happened once in the available logstash recorded history, do we still feel this is a major gate issue? See:

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/24/2014 11:18 AM, Peter Portante wrote: Hi Sean, Given the swift failure happened once in the available logstash recorded history, do we still feel this is a major gate issue? See:

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Clay Gerrard
That's a pretty high rate of failure, and really needs investigation. That's a great point, did you look into the logs of any of those jobs? Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I saw a few swift tests that would pop, I'll open bugs to look into those. But the cardinality of the

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Clay Gerrard clay.gerr...@gmail.com wrote: That's a pretty high rate of failure, and really needs investigation. That's a great point, did you look into the logs of any of those jobs? Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I saw a few swift tests that

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Peter Portante
Hi Sean, In the last 7 days I see only 6 python27 based test failures:

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Clark Boylan
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014, at 10:51 AM, John Griffith wrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Clay Gerrard clay.gerr...@gmail.com wrote: That's a pretty high rate of failure, and really needs investigation. That's a great point, did you look into the logs of any of those jobs? Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/24/2014 02:02 PM, Peter Portante wrote: Hi Sean, In the last 7 days I see only 6 python27 based test failures:

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Clay Gerrard clay.gerr...@gmail.comwrote: That's a pretty high rate of failure, and really needs investigation. That's a great point, did you look into the logs of any of those jobs? Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I saw a few swift tests that

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Clay Gerrard
OH yeah that's much better. I had found those eventually but had to dig through all that other stuff :'( Moving forward I think we can keep an eye on that page, open bugs for those tests causing issue and dig in. Thanks again! -Clay On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I've found out that several jobs are exhibiting failures like bug 1254890 [1] and bug 1253896 [2] because openvswitch seem to be crashing the kernel. The kernel trace reports as offending process usually either neutron-ns-metadata-proxy or dnsmasq, but [3] seem to clearly point to ovs-vsctl. 254

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote: I've found out that several jobs are exhibiting failures like bug 1254890 [1] and bug 1253896 [2] because openvswitch seem to be crashing the kernel. The kernel trace reports as offending process usually either

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate Status - Friday Edition

2014-01-24 Thread Chris Wright
* Salvatore Orlando (sorla...@nicira.com) wrote: I've found out that several jobs are exhibiting failures like bug 1254890 [1] and bug 1253896 [2] because openvswitch seem to be crashing the kernel. The kernel trace reports as offending process usually either neutron-ns-metadata-proxy or