Re: [openstack-dev] Manila TripleO Mitaka
Hi Marios, I have just deployed Tripleo Newton (stable) and I can see that the Manila templates are now present. Can I deploy Manila yet with TripleO Newton , or is the implementation still incomplete? Thanks Charles On 07/07/2016 17:14, Marios Andreou wrote: On 07/07/16 14:25, Charles Short wrote: Hi, Hi Charles, I am deploying TripleO Mitaka stable and want to include the NetApp Manila driver referenced here - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/advanced_deployment/deploy_manila.html thanks for pointing those docs out - to be honest I don't know why we landed those since the manila integration itself is still in progress. I went looking for the gerrit review but gave up - found the commit at https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-docs/commit/01ee4f59356b7d7df572d021931a4c7fa1e07cd9 ... in any case I think we need to mark these WIP and I'm doing that at https://review.openstack.org/339109 I cannot see either templates available in the Undercloud. Digging a bit it looks like there are some hurdles to overcome - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096126.html Does anyone have an update on progress, especially for the NetApp driver? Currently I am aware of three reviews related to Manila. One is the 'main' patch to land manila-generic backend and the other two are for netap and gluster integration respectively. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188137/ “Enable Manila integration - as a composable controller service” https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188138/ “Add integration with NetApp Manila driver” https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230936/ “Add Gluster integration to Manila” The Manila integration as a composable service needs to land first. The Netapp and Gluster reviews I've not had any involvement in at all; they will also need to tlc to get landed, but they both depend on the 'main' manila integration patch. Hope that helps clarify the situation somewhat, thanks, marios Many thanks Charles __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Charles Short Cloud Engineer Virtualization and Cloud Team European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) Tel: +44 (0)1223 494205 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Manila TripleO Mitaka
Hi Marios, Many thanks for the update, that does help clarify Regards Charles Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Jul 2016, at 17:14, Marios Andreou wrote: > >> On 07/07/16 14:25, Charles Short wrote: >> Hi, > Hi Charles, > >> >> I am deploying TripleO Mitaka stable and want to include the NetApp >> Manila driver referenced here - >> >> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/advanced_deployment/deploy_manila.html > > thanks for pointing those docs out - to be honest I don't know why we > landed those since the manila integration itself is still in progress. I > went looking for the gerrit review but gave up - found the commit at > https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-docs/commit/01ee4f59356b7d7df572d021931a4c7fa1e07cd9 > ... in any case I think we need to mark these WIP and I'm doing that at > https://review.openstack.org/339109 > > >> I cannot see either templates available in the Undercloud. >> >> Digging a bit it looks like there are some hurdles to overcome - >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096126.html >> >> Does anyone have an update on progress, especially for the NetApp driver? > > > Currently I am aware of three reviews related to Manila. One is the > 'main' patch to land manila-generic backend and the other two are for > netap and gluster integration respectively. > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188137/ “Enable Manila integration > - as a composable controller service” > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188138/ “Add integration with > NetApp Manila driver” > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230936/ “Add Gluster integration to > Manila” > > > The Manila integration as a composable service needs to land first. The > Netapp and Gluster reviews I've not had any involvement in at all; they > will also need to tlc to get landed, but they both depend on the 'main' > manila integration patch. > > > Hope that helps clarify the situation somewhat, > > thanks, marios > > > >> >> Many thanks >> >> Charles > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] Manila TripleO Mitaka
On 07/07/16 14:25, Charles Short wrote: > Hi, Hi Charles, > > I am deploying TripleO Mitaka stable and want to include the NetApp > Manila driver referenced here - > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/advanced_deployment/deploy_manila.html > > thanks for pointing those docs out - to be honest I don't know why we landed those since the manila integration itself is still in progress. I went looking for the gerrit review but gave up - found the commit at https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-docs/commit/01ee4f59356b7d7df572d021931a4c7fa1e07cd9 ... in any case I think we need to mark these WIP and I'm doing that at https://review.openstack.org/339109 > I cannot see either templates available in the Undercloud. > > Digging a bit it looks like there are some hurdles to overcome - > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096126.html > > Does anyone have an update on progress, especially for the NetApp driver? Currently I am aware of three reviews related to Manila. One is the 'main' patch to land manila-generic backend and the other two are for netap and gluster integration respectively. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188137/ “Enable Manila integration - as a composable controller service” https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188138/ “Add integration with NetApp Manila driver” https://review.openstack.org/#/c/230936/ “Add Gluster integration to Manila” The Manila integration as a composable service needs to land first. The Netapp and Gluster reviews I've not had any involvement in at all; they will also need to tlc to get landed, but they both depend on the 'main' manila integration patch. Hope that helps clarify the situation somewhat, thanks, marios > > Many thanks > > Charles > __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev