Re: [openstack-dev] Need nova-specs core reviews for Scheduler spec

2015-02-06 Thread Ed Leafe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/06/2015 12:15 PM, Nikola ─Éipanov wrote:

 I've left a comment on the spec - basically I don't think this is an
 approach we should take.

Understood. There have been so many back-and-forth changes, with each
making the solution more and more complex, that it is hard to understand
the benefit. Essentially, we were trying to get as close to the eventual
state where the Scheduler knows everything it needs to make its decisions.

 Since I was not at the midcycle, I am sorry the discussions happened so
 close to the FF freeze, and there was not enough time to get broader
 feedback from the community in time.

No worries; it's not like there isn't anything else for you guys to be
reviewing or anything. :)

IAC, I've pushed a new revision of the spec. It's much simpler, with
much less impact, but it doesn't model the scheduler knows all ideal
as much. I'd be interested in your feedback, as well as everyone else's.
I think that this simpler approach will also be much more doable in the
Kilo timeframe.

- -- 

- -- Ed Leafe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=kh4g
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Need nova-specs core reviews for Scheduler spec

2015-02-06 Thread Nikola ─Éipanov
On 02/06/2015 02:15 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
 At the mid-cycle we discussed the last spec for the scheduler cleanup: 
 Isolate Scheduler DB for Instances
 
 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138444/
 
 There was a lot of great feedback from those discussions, and that has been 
 incorporated into the spec. It has been re-reviewed by most of the scheduler 
 team with several +1s, but we really need the cores to approve it so we can 
 move ahead with the patches.
 

Hey Ed,

I've left a comment on the spec - basically I don't think this is an
approach we should take.

Since I was not at the midcycle, I am sorry the discussions happened so
close to the FF freeze, and there was not enough time to get broader
feedback from the community in time.

Best,
N.


__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev