Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-27 Thread Julien Danjou
On Wed, Oct 23 2013, Sean Dague wrote: Goals - Short Term === As much feedback as possible from both core projects and openstack deployers about the kinds of things that they believe we should be logging, and the kinds of levels they think those things should land at.

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Dan Smith
Example 1: == n-conductor log in tempest/devstack - http://logs.openstack.org/70/52870/3/check/check-tempest-devstack-vm-full/f46b756/logs/screen-n-cond.txt.gz Total log lines: 84076 Total non DEBUG lines: 61 Question: do we need more than 1 level of

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:05:19AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote: Some of them are not useful to me (but might be to others), like the amqp channel lines. However, everything else has been pretty crucial at one point or another when debugging issues that span between the two tightly-coupled services.

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman l...@redhat.comwrote: On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:05:19AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote: Some of them are not useful to me (but might be to others), like the amqp channel lines. However, everything else has been pretty crucial at one point or

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/24/2013 10:05 AM, Dan Smith wrote: Example 1: == n-conductor log in tempest/devstack - http://logs.openstack.org/70/52870/3/check/check-tempest-devstack-vm-full/f46b756/logs/screen-n-cond.txt.gz Total log lines: 84076 Total non DEBUG lines: 61 Question:

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Dan Smith
If we had DEBUG and DEBUG2 levels, where one of them would only be seen at the higher debug level, would that be useful? I'm fine with not seeing those for devstack runs, yeah. --Dan ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/24/2013 11:00 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 10/24/2013 10:05 AM, Dan Smith wrote: Example 1: == n-conductor log in tempest/devstack - http://logs.openstack.org/70/52870/3/check/check-tempest-devstack-vm-full/f46b756/logs/screen-n-cond.txt.gz Total log lines: 84076

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Brant Knudson
On a previous project, I wrote a library that provided a command-line option to set the logging levels for different loggers. This was handy for developers and for support. An example translated to Keystone would be like keystone-all --logging=keystone.identity=DEBUG Now the keystone.identity

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-24 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/24/2013 11:46 AM, Brant Knudson wrote: On a previous project, I wrote a library that provided a command-line option to set the logging levels for different loggers. This was handy for developers and for support. An example translated to Keystone would be like keystone-all

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread Clark Boylan
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: One of the efforts that we're working on from the QA team is tooling that ensures we aren't stack tracing into our test logs during normal tempest runs. Random stack traces are scary to cloud admins consuming OpenStack logs,

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: One of the efforts that we're working on from the QA team is tooling that ensures we aren't stack tracing into our test logs during normal tempest runs. Random stack traces are scary to cloud admins consuming OpenStack logs,

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread Robert Collins
On 24 October 2013 08:14, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Deprecation warnings! Based on the approach we're taking in the patch below, we'll be able to notate how imminently a feature is facing deprecation.

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.comwrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: One of the efforts that we're working on from the QA team is tooling that ensures we aren't stack tracing into our test logs during normal tempest

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread Robert Collins
On 24 October 2013 08:28, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: So I touched on this a bit in my earlier post but want to reiterate here and maybe clarify a bit. I agree that cleaning up and standardizing the logs is a good thing, and particularly removing unhandled exception

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread David Stanek
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: On 24 October 2013 08:14, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Deprecation warnings! Based on the approach we're taking in the

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC - Icehouse logging harmonization

2013-10-23 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/23/2013 03:35 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 24 October 2013 08:28, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: So I touched on this a bit in my earlier post but want to reiterate here and maybe clarify a bit. I agree that cleaning up and standardizing the logs is a good thing, and