Re: [openstack-dev] Reverting recent refactorings of RBD support for config drives

2014-09-22 Thread Solly Ross
Overall, this looks good. Your alternate implementation misses LVM support, and leaves an unused file behind in the instance directory. Other than that, it's acceptable for a late-stage change, IMO. Best Regards, Solly - Original Message - From: Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com To:

Re: [openstack-dev] Reverting recent refactorings of RBD support for config drives

2014-09-22 Thread Michael Still
I think we should leave LVM out for now -- I am not sure it makes sense to put a tens of megabyte file into its own LV. I'll fix the cleanup thing today. Michael On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: Overall, this looks good. Your alternate implementation misses