Re: [openstack-dev] StarlingX gap analysis to converge with OpenStack master

2018-11-22 Thread Sean Mooney
hi just following up form yesterday. i just finished testing the pci numa policy feature and i can confirm that the prefer policy which allow use of non local pci devices does not work. the test case was relitively simple 1 host with 2 numa nodes 1 pci device attach to numa node 0 and vcpu pin

Re: [openstack-dev] StarlingX gap analysis to converge with OpenStack master

2018-11-21 Thread Xu, Chenjie
Hi Miguel, There is another RFE “Add l2pop support for floating IP resources” proposed to Launchpad. This RFE also comes from StarlingX and the link is below: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1803494 Could you please help review this RFE? I think this RFE can be added to the gap analysis.

Re: [openstack-dev] StarlingX gap analysis to converge with OpenStack master

2018-11-21 Thread melanie witt
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:23:51 +0100, Melanie Witt wrote: On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:11:50 -0600, Miguel Lavalle wrote: One of the key goals of StarlingX during the current cycle is to converge with the OpenStack projects master branches. In order to accomplish this goal, the Technical Steering

Re: [openstack-dev] StarlingX gap analysis to converge with OpenStack master

2018-11-21 Thread melanie witt
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:11:50 -0600, Miguel Lavalle wrote: One of the key goals of StarlingX during the current cycle is to converge with the OpenStack projects master branches. In order to accomplish this goal, the Technical Steering Committee put together a gap analysis that shows the specs

Re: [openstack-dev] StarlingX gap analysis to converge with OpenStack master

2018-11-21 Thread Mohammed Naser
Thanks for doing this in the open and working with the upstream teams to reduce divergence! On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:17 PM Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Hi Stackers, > > One of the key goals of StarlingX during the current cycle is to converge > with the OpenStack projects master branches. In order