Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-03-10 14:48:50 + (+), Kiall Mac Innes wrote: > For anyone who may try doing this again in the future, don't set the > invite only flag (+i), and > then the +f #openstack-stable will trigger a redirect to the new channel. This was intentional. It was left without -i for a period of

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-10 Thread Anita Kuno
On 03/10/2016 10:02 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 3/10/2016 7:53 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 03/09/2016 12:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help >>> with packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 3/10/2016 7:53 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 03/09/2016 12:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help with packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says the #openstack-stable channel is also for packaging discussions,

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-10 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
On 09/03/16 17:57, Louis Taylor wrote: > From ChanServ: > > 17:55:03 -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- Information on #openstack-packaging: > 17:55:03 -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- Registered : Nov 11 18:59:55 > 2011 (4y 17w 0d ago) > 17:55:03 -ChanServ(ChanServ@services.)- Last used : (about 75

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-10 Thread Anita Kuno
On 03/09/2016 12:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help > with packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says > the #openstack-stable channel is also for packaging discussions, given > -stable originated from distro

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/09/2016 07:28 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Ha, the irony. > > OK, so I thought awhile back, around YVR summit time, there was a group > of different packagers from different distros (debian/red > hat/fedora/suse) that were working together on some common tooling. > > Is that still a thing

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Thomas Bechtold
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:28:59PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: [snipped] > Ha, the irony. > > OK, so I thought awhile back, around YVR summit time, there was a group of > different packagers from different distros (debian/red hat/fedora/suse) that > were working together on some common tooling.

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Joshua Harlow
On 03/09/2016 10:28 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Is that still a thing and if so, do they congregate somewhere? Because *that's* where I think people need to go, not the #openstack-stable channel. There is an #openstack-anvil channel, The anvil project had/has similar goals of being a

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 03/09/2016 07:28 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Ha, the irony. > > OK, so I thought awhile back, around YVR summit time, there was a group > of different packagers from different distros (debian/red > hat/fedora/suse) that were working together on some common tooling. > > Is that still a thing

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 03/09/2016 06:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help > with packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says > the #openstack-stable channel is also for packaging discussions, given > -stable originated from distro

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 3/9/2016 11:57 AM, Louis Taylor wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help with packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says the #openstack-stable

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Louis Taylor
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Someone showed up in the -stable channel this morning asking for help with > packaging. I gather they were there because the IRC wiki [1] says the > #openstack-stable channel is also for packaging discussions,

Re: [openstack-dev] The #openstack-packaging channel requires an invite?

2016-03-09 Thread Mathieu Gagné
It got renamed a couple of months/year ago to #openstack-stable: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1360324 Documentation should have been updated to reflect this change. Channel being invite-only is probably a side-effect of the migration. Mathieu On 2016-03-09 12:48 PM, Matt