Re: [openstack-dev] offlist: The scope of OpenStack wiki [all]

2015-01-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
Anne Gentle wrote:
> Oh hi list!
> 
> Feel free to discuss the "a project just getting started" content that
> ends up on the wiki -- where would that go?

I think that's still fine for nascent projects to use the wiki as "a
poor man CMS". This hardly qualifies as authoritative content and falls
more into the "quick prototypes" that Stefano mentioned as appropriate
on the long-term wiki.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] offlist: The scope of OpenStack wiki [all]

2015-01-09 Thread Anne Gentle
Oh hi list!

Feel free to discuss the "a project just getting started" content that ends
up on the wiki -- where would that go?

Anne

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Anne Gentle  wrote:

> Hi Stef, thanks for writing this up. One aspect this proposal doesn't
> address is the ungoverned content for projects that are either in
> stackforge, pre-stackforge, incubating, or have no intention of any
> governance but want to use the openstack wiki. What can we do if one of
> those groups raises the issue? We can talk more about it tomorrow but it's
> problematic. Not unsolvable but lack of governance is one reason to be on
> the wiki.
> Anne
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Stefano Maffulli 
> wrote:
>
>> hello folks,
>>
>> TL;DR Many wiki pages and categories are maintained elsewhere and to
>> avoid confusion to newcomers we need to agree on a new scope for the
>> wiki. A suggestion below is to limit its scope to content that doesn't
>> need/want peer-review and is not hosted elsewhere (no duplication).
>>
>> The wiki served for many years the purpose of 'poor man CMS' when we
>> didn't have an easy way to collaboratively create content. So the wiki
>> ended up hosting pages like 'Getting started with OpenStack', demo
>> videos, How to contribute, mission, to document our culture / shared
>> understandings (4 opens, release cycle, use of blueprints, stable branch
>> policy...), to maintain the list of Programs, meetings/teams, blueprints
>> and specs, lots of random documentation and more.
>>
>> Lots of the content originally placed on the wiki was there because
>> there was no better place. Now that we have more mature content and
>> processes, these are finding their way out of the wiki like:
>>
>>   * http://governance.openstack.org
>>   * http://specs.openstack.org
>>   * http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/
>>
>> Also, the Introduction to OpenStack is maintained on
>> www.openstack.org/software/ together with introductory videos and other
>> basic material. A redesign of openstack.org/community and the new portal
>> groups.openstack.org are making even more wiki pages obsolete.
>>
>> This makes the wiki very confusing to newcomers and more likely to host
>> conflicting information.
>>
>> I would propose to restrict the scope of the wiki to things that
>> anything that don't need or want to be peer-reviewed. Things like:
>>
>>   * agendas for meetings, sprints, etc
>>   * list of etherpads for summits
>>   * quick prototypes of new programs (mentors, upstream training) before
>> they find a stable home (which can still be the wiki)
>>
>> Also, documentation for contributors and users should not be on the
>> wiki, but on docs.openstack.org (where it can be found more easily).
>>
>> If nobody objects, I'll start by proposing a new home page design and
>> start tagging content that may be moved elsewhere.
>>
>> /stef
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev