Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joshua Harlow
Another idea I had: It appears like a lot of the current hacking issues can be automatically fixed. So it would be really nice if the hacking tool included a fix for most of the problems it finds. I started https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68988/ but don't have the time to do a full tool, but it

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 17/06/14 02:46, Ben Nemec wrote: > > On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Sean Dague wrote: > >>> Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire > >>> che

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Jun 16, 2014 9:44 AM, "Ben Nemec" wrote: > >> > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> > Sean Dague w

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Nemec
On 06/16/2014 05:46 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 06/16/2014 04:46 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >>> On 06/16/2014 05:06 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 06/16/2014 12:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 06/16/2

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Nemec
On 06/16/2014 04:46 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 06/16/2014 05:06 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >>> On 06/16/2014 12:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Sean

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2014 9:44 AM, "Ben Nemec" wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> > Sean Dague wrote: >> >> Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The enti

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/06/14 02:46, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Sean Dague wrote: >>> Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire >>> check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals >>> faili

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/16/2014 05:06 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > On 06/16/2014 12:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > >>> On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: > > Hacking 0.9 series was rel

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/16/2014 05:06 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 06/16/2014 12:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >>> On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: > Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The > entire check queue was floo

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Nemec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/16/2014 12:01 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Sean Dague wrote: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flood

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Jun 16, 2014 10:02 AM, "Sean Dague" wrote: > > On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > > On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Sean Dague wrote: > >>> Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire > >>> check queue was flooded this morning with requirements pr

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Joe Gordon
On Jun 16, 2014 9:44 AM, "Ben Nemec" wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Sean Dague wrote: > >> Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire > >> check queue was flooded this morning with requirements

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Morgan Fainberg
: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-06-16 05:15:54 -0700: > Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check > queue was flooded this morning with r

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2014-06-16 05:15:54 -0700: > Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check > queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8 > because of it (so at 6am EST we were waiting 1.5 hrs for a check node). > > The prev

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Sean Dague
On 06/16/2014 12:44 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Sean Dague wrote: >>> Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire >>> check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals >>> failing pep8 because of it (so at 6am EST we we

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Ben Nemec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Sean Dague wrote: >> Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire >> check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals >> failing pep8 because of it (so at 6am EST we we

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sean Dague wrote: > Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check > queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8 > because of it (so at 6am EST we were waiting 1.5 hrs for a check node). > > The previous soft policy with pep8 updates was that we