Tim Bell wrote:
Can we get a TC policy that 'project' is the standard and that all projects
using tenant should plan a smooth migration path to project along with the
timescales for implementation and retirement of tenant ?
Feel free to propose such policy for TC review. Rules of engagement
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:17:56PM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/11/13 12:47 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com
wrote:
In all honesty it
Hi Steve,
There was a long thread about dropping project ID/tenant ID from the URL at
http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/c2wi2uwdsye32z7f
Looking back through it, it looks like nova v3 has it removed
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/v3-api-remove-project-id
Maybe something in there
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 08:17:59AM -0600, Anne Gentle wrote:
Hi Steve,
There was a long thread about dropping project ID/tenant ID from the URL at
http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/c2wi2uwdsye32z7f
Looking back through it, it looks like nova v3 has it removed
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:17:56PM +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 24/11/13 12:47 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/11/13 12:47 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com
wrote:
In all honesty it doesn't matter which term we go with. As long as we
are
consistent
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] tenant or project
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/11/13 12:47 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Morgan Fainberg m
On 24/11/13 12:47 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com wrote:
In all honesty it doesn't matter which term we go with. As long as we are
consistent and define the meaning. I think we can argue intuitive vs
non-intuitive in
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] tenant or project
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Dolph Mathews
dolph.math...@gmail.commailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for using the term project across all services. Projects provide
multi-tenant
From a purely documentation and explanatory standpoint I vote for
project, if we're going to standardize on one or the other.
On Nov 23, 2013 7:13 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So in the past we've used both tenant and project to refer to the same
thing and I think its
Horizon uses Project in the user interface, yet the openstack.rc file contains
tenant_id and tenant_name. It makes it very difficult to write user guides
given that such a fundamental concept has two names.
No problem to maintain compatibility (i.e. try OS_TENANT_NAME after
OS_PROJECT_NAME)
On 11/23/2013 08:28 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
Horizon uses Project in the user interface, yet the openstack.rc file
contains tenant_id and tenant_name. It makes it very difficult to write user
guides given that such a fundamental concept has two names.
+1. I struggled with this
+1 for using the term project across all services. Projects provide
multi-tenant isolation for resources across the cloud. Part of the reason
we prefer projects in keystone is that domains conceptually provide
multi-tenant isolation within keystone itself, so the overloaded tenant
terminology gets
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.comwrote:
+1 for using the term project across all services. Projects provide
multi-tenant isolation for resources across the cloud. Part of the reason
we prefer projects in keystone is that domains conceptually provide
[mailto:dtro...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 November 2013 19:03
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] tenant or project
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Dolph Mathews
dolph.math...@gmail.commailto:dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for using the term
On November 23, 2013 4:09:49 AM Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
So in the past we've used both tenant and project to refer to the same
thing and I think its been a source of confusion for people new to
OpenStack. In the Nova code we use both, but at least for the API we've
been
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Caitlin Bestler
caitlin.best...@nexenta.com wrote:
On November 23, 2013 4:09:49 AM Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
So in the past we've used both tenant and project to refer to the same
thing and I think its been a source of confusion for
I have seen several people request that their users be members of two
projects and that they be allow to publish objects that are Shared by
multiple projects.
For some reason the people who request these complex data constructions
always prefer to call the enclosing entity a project. I have
In all honesty it doesn't matter which term we go with. As long as we are
consistent and define the meaning. I think we can argue intuitive vs
non-intuitive in this case unto the ground. I prefer project to tenant,
but beyond being a bit of an overloaded term, I really don't think anyone
will
19 matches
Mail list logo
