Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-04 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Lana

 Additionally, I found.
 Following Karma seems high for Matt and me.

> > >>>>>> Current cores not appearing in any stats:

https://launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+topcontributors
https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-site/+topcontributors

Hopefully, launchpad karma affects the stats :-)

Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI


On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:20:54 +0900
Atsushi SAKAI <sak...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Lana
> 
> Thank you for commenting me.
> 
> > I use the russelbryant stats 
> > http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> > I haven't heard anything specific from Atsushi-san.
> 
> I am doing launchpad bugs reviewing mainly (api-site and manuals)
>   (but I recognize working contribution is low at this moment.)
> 
> for example (commenting bug list, not confirmed bug list)
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/~sakaia/+commentedbugs?orderby=-id=0
> 
> Thanks
> Atsushi SAKAI
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:39:37 +1000
> Lana Brindley <openst...@lanabrindley.com> wrote:
> 
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> > 
> > I use the russelbryant stats (which are linked in the headers), because of 
> > comments made on this list back when we changed the process. The main 
> > reason, IIRC, was because it was more specific to openstack-manuals. Happy 
> > to reopen that conversation, though. In my core reviews, when I use the 
> > term "not appearing in any stats", I mean not appearing on my spreadsheet 
> > (which only looks at the top 12 in each c ategory). I can change the 
> > wording of this to make it clearer. 
> > 
> > I note that, while Matt is still participating at a high level, he just 
> > isn't in the top 12. I put this down to increased focus on the Install 
> > Guide testing, but I'm happy to hear from Matt if I've made an erroneous 
> > assumption there. To respond to Andreas' query about other underperforming 
> > cores, I can explain that Christian and Darren are both focussed on other 
> > interest areas right now, and forewarned me that their contributions would 
> > drop. They will both be returning to normal shortly. I haven't heard 
> > anything specific from Atsushi-san.
> > 
> > Hope that helps,
> > Lana
> > 
> > On 04/03/16 00:37, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mariia Zlatkova <mzlatk...@mirantis.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > >> I thought we were using this link:
> > >> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> > >>
> > >>
> > > To root cause this misperception, I want to point out that I clicked the
> > > links in the column headers. Lana, can you fix those? Whether we point to
> > > stackalytics or russelbryant may also be a point to discuss.
> > > 
> > > Anne
> > > 
> > > 
> > >> Maria
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> - Original Message -
> > >>>> From: "Anne Gentle" <annegen...@justwriteclick.com>
> > >>>> To: "Andreas Jaeger" <a...@suse.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote:
> > >>>>>> Hi core team,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Current cores not appearing in any stats:
> > >>>>>> Matthew Kassawara
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Matt has been working hard on Install Guide testing (which doesn’t
> > >>> run
> > >>>>>> through Gerrit), so this is expected. It’s also expected to impact
> > >>> the
> > >>>>>> stats of other core reviewers involved in that task.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> What does "not appearing in any stats" mean exactly?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> I couldn't find him on Stackalytics, take a look at this (which makes 
> > >>>> me
> > >>>> wonder if the affiliation change is broken?)
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> http://stackalytics.com/?module=

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - March 2016

2016-03-03 Thread Atsushi SAKAI
Lana

Thank you for commenting me.

> I use the russelbryant stats 
> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> I haven't heard anything specific from Atsushi-san.

I am doing launchpad bugs reviewing mainly (api-site and manuals)
  (but I recognize working contribution is low at this moment.)

for example (commenting bug list, not confirmed bug list)
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/~sakaia/+commentedbugs?orderby=-id=0

Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI



On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:39:37 +1000
Lana Brindley <openst...@lanabrindley.com> wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> I use the russelbryant stats (which are linked in the headers), because of 
> comments made on this list back when we changed the process. The main reason, 
> IIRC, was because it was more specific to openstack-manuals. Happy to reopen 
> that conversation, though. In my core reviews, when I use the term "not 
> appearing in any stats", I mean not appearing on my spreadsheet (which only 
> looks at the top 12 in each c ategory). I can change the wording of this to 
> make it clearer. 
> 
> I note that, while Matt is still participating at a high level, he just isn't 
> in the top 12. I put this down to increased focus on the Install Guide 
> testing, but I'm happy to hear from Matt if I've made an erroneous assumption 
> there. To respond to Andreas' query about other underperforming cores, I can 
> explain that Christian and Darren are both focussed on other interest areas 
> right now, and forewarned me that their contributions would drop. They will 
> both be returning to normal shortly. I haven't heard anything specific from 
> Atsushi-san.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> Lana
> 
> On 04/03/16 00:37, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mariia Zlatkova <mzlatk...@mirantis.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> I thought we were using this link:
> >> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/documentation-group/90
> >>
> >>
> > To root cause this misperception, I want to point out that I clicked the
> > links in the column headers. Lana, can you fix those? Whether we point to
> > stackalytics or russelbryant may also be a point to discuss.
> > 
> > Anne
> > 
> > 
> >> Maria
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>>> From: "Anne Gentle" <annegen...@justwriteclick.com>
> >>>> To: "Andreas Jaeger" <a...@suse.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 2016-03-03 01:19, Lana Brindley wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi core team,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Current cores not appearing in any stats:
> >>>>>> Matthew Kassawara
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Matt has been working hard on Install Guide testing (which doesn’t
> >>> run
> >>>>>> through Gerrit), so this is expected. It’s also expected to impact
> >>> the
> >>>>>> stats of other core reviewers involved in that task.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What does "not appearing in any stats" mean exactly?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I couldn't find him on Stackalytics, take a look at this (which makes me
> >>>> wonder if the affiliation change is broken?)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> http://stackalytics.com/?module=openstack-manuals=liberty=commits_id=ionosphere80
> >>>
> >>> That query is explicitly pinned to liberty only and also measuring
> >>> commits not reviews. I would think these are the more relevant 
> >>> stackalytics
> >>> views (and Matt is on them):
> >>>
> >>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/openstack-manuals/30
> >>> http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/openstack-manuals/90
> >>>
> >>> I still tend to use Russell's stats at:
> >>>
> >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-30.txt
> >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-60.txt
> >>> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-reviewers-90.txt
> >>>
> >>> -Steve
> >>>
> >&