gt; Subscribe to Docs|Code: docslikecode.com
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
> Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net
Hi Docs team cores,
Tomorrow, we'd like to approve our new spec to update docs retention policy
for Queens. So far, we've got +2's from doc cores. Please consider approving
or making final comments on the spec before we give it a go.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507629/
Thanks,
pk
--
hange Anne's
permissions and send a quick announcement.
Thanks,
pk
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Petr Kovar <pko...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi core team,
> >
> > For this round of core review stats, I tracked the top 8 contributors only
> > in each categ
On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:53:14 +0100
Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote:
> On 2017-12-01 15:48, Petr Kovar wrote:
> > [...]
> > To sum up, my recommendation for September is:
> >
> > Drop: No one
> > Add: No one
>
> If this is also your December recom
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:27:10 +0200
Petr Kovar <pko...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback, everybody. I made some more edits to the
> document and tried to address the remaining comments left in the etherpad.
>
> I think the current revision of the doc provi
Hi core team,
Doug suggested that we open up the process of nominating people for cores
(and retiring) and do it in the -dev mailing list, together with other
[docs] conversations.
Would there be any objections to start discussing core stats reviews in the
open, beginning with February?
Best,
Dear core team,
Unless there are objections, I'll skip this month's openstack-manual stats
review as the stats would be heavily influenced by most people taking time
off in December. Let's continue with the reviews next month.
Thanks,
pk
--
Mailing list:
7 matches
Mail list logo
