Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:43:36PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/25/2016 01:54 PM, Spencer Krum wrote: > > > > When working on a previous project, Nikki wrote this tool as a general > > purpose hook into gerrit: > > > > https://github.com/notnownikki/zoidberg > > > > I don't think she is

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Ian Wienand
On 05/26/2016 04:43 AM, Sean Dague wrote: One thing I've been thinking a bit about is whether the event stream could get into something like MQTT easily. Although larger in scope than just gerrit, Fedora has something very similar to this with fedmsg [1] It is a pretty cool idea to have

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/25/2016 01:54 PM, Spencer Krum wrote: > > When working on a previous project, Nikki wrote this tool as a general > purpose hook into gerrit: > > https://github.com/notnownikki/zoidberg > > I don't think she is actively maintaining or using it right now though. One thing I've been

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Spencer Krum
When working on a previous project, Nikki wrote this tool as a general purpose hook into gerrit: https://github.com/notnownikki/zoidberg I don't think she is actively maintaining or using it right now though. -- Spencer Krum n...@spencerkrum.com

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Anita Kuno
On 05/25/2016 01:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-05-25 11:43:39 -0500 (-0500), Gregory Haynes wrote: > [...] >> We are considering making a small project to connect to and read >> from the Gerrit event stream and then update our bug tracker. > [...] >> If we implemented this, would this be

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-25 11:43:39 -0500 (-0500), Gregory Haynes wrote: [...] > We are considering making a small project to connect to and read > from the Gerrit event stream and then update our bug tracker. [...] > If we implemented this, would this be something the -infra project > would like to have live

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Gregory Haynes
On Wed, May 25, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Jimmy Mcarthur wrote: > I'm not sure about Infra, but we're in the same boat with one of our bug > trackers. This would be awesome to have and I'm sure we would use it. > > Out of curiosity, what bug tracker are you currently using? GitHub Enterprise, although

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Jimmy Mcarthur
I'm not sure about Infra, but we're in the same boat with one of our bug trackers. This would be awesome to have and I'm sure we would use it. Out of curiosity, what bug tracker are you currently using? Cheers, Jimmy Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello -Infra folks, While setting up an

[OpenStack-Infra] A tool for slurping gerrit changes in to bug updates

2016-05-25 Thread Gregory Haynes
Hello -Infra folks, While setting up an OpenStack-infra style testing infrastructure we have run in to the need for a tool to update our issue tracker in a different manner than the current Gerrit -> jeepyb system used for OpenStack. Our issue boils down to the fact that our bug tracker lives on

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] The future of our server naming patterns

2016-05-25 Thread James E. Blair
Spencer Krum writes: >> Though I've since been thinking (and a quick codesearch[*] confirms >> it) that we have a bunch of hostname==service/vhost assumptions >> baked into our configuration management right now. While I'm not >> opposed to the plan in principle, executing