Hi everyone,
I brought this up a few meetings ago, but I wanted to collect the
thoughts in one place to more easily get infra team input on the
status of work toward a translations checksite for the i18n team. As
some history, the i18n team wrote a specification a while back which
we approved,
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:43:14PM +0100, Darragh Bailey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> To try and minimise trashing of both core reviews and V2.0 patch author(s),
> I'd like to propose that we pick a time/day every second week for 3-4
> iterations where those interested set aside a set block of time to
>
I am fine with starting this Friday. I am also okay with starting any time
afterwards too.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Darragh Bailey
wrote:
>
> Sounds like Friday is the clear winner. Do we want to stay this Friday? Or
> would everyone prefer a bit more notice to
Sounds like Friday is the clear winner. Do we want to stay this Friday? Or
would everyone prefer a bit more notice to plan things with their other
work?
I'm not around Friday 15th, but it could start then anyway if others are
happy (might need one more core to help land stuff that day)? Otherwise
Hey Darragh,
For Mon/Fri, the current time slots both works for me.
Thanks,
Dong
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Dong Ma wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Darragh,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with your thought and would like to participate to the reviews,
>>> although the time slots
Hi Kien,
What I thought is the changes made to convert to xml function have been
updated to a lot of plugins, also some plugins have not been updated. So if
we have a spec to keep why and how to use the convert to xml function and
which plugins have been updated, which not, it will be great. But
Hi Dong,
Looks like I misinterpreted what you mean the first time around, sorry
about that. To clarify, did you mean to keep track of changes made to
convert to xml function or to keep track of the plugins that have been
updated to use the function? If it is wanted, I can go ahead and start