Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Nodepool drivers

2017-12-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-12-01 16:08:00 -0800: > Tristan Cacqueray writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Now that the zuulv3 release is approaching, please find below a > > follow-up on this spec. > > > > The current code could use one more patch[0] to untangle the common > > config from the op

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul roadmap

2017-12-01 Thread James E. Blair
Fabien Boucher writes: >> * finish git driver >> > > If ok for you, I want to propose myself to work on that git driver topic. > I'll try to > provide a first patch asap. That's great, thanks! There's some code there already, but it has no tests and hasn't been used in a while -- I don't know i

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Nodepool drivers

2017-12-01 Thread James E. Blair
Tristan Cacqueray writes: > Hi, > > Now that the zuulv3 release is approaching, please find below a > follow-up on this spec. > > The current code could use one more patch[0] to untangle the common > config from the openstack provider specific bits. The patch often needs > to be manualy rebased.

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] git-review with git 2.15

2017-12-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-11-01 12:21:33 + (+), Harry Mallon wrote: > Git version 2.15 is the most recent version and has a couple of > issues with git-review. [...] I meant to reply to the thread sooner, but this should now be working in git-review 1.26.0 (released roughly two weeks ago). -- Jeremy Stanle

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Zuul roadmap

2017-12-01 Thread Fabien Boucher
Hi, On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:47 PM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > At the PTG we brainstormed a road map for Zuul once we completed the > infra cutover. I think we're in a position now that we can get back to > thinking about this, so I've (slightly) cleaned it up and organized it > here. > >