On 26/02/15 17:59, James E. Blair wrote:
A new Zuul component would be created to execute jobs. Rather than
running a worker process on each node (which requires installing
software on the test node, and establishing and maintaining network
connectivity back to Zuul, and the ability to
Antoine Musso has...@free.fr writes:
Something worry me, is that the Zuul scheduler layout file might end
up very long and complicated since it will define both the workflow
and the tasks with their context. The later is currently done in
Jenkins jobs
Thanks for your thoughts. You make a
On 02/28/2015 12:48 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-28 08:41:40 -0800:
Jim, great stuff. A couple suggestions inline :)
On 02/26/2015 09:59 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
A tenant may optionally specify repos from which it may derive its
configuration. In this
Jim, great stuff. A couple suggestions inline :)
On 02/26/2015 09:59 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
A tenant may optionally specify repos from which it may derive its
configuration. In this manner, a repo may keep its Zuul configuration
within its own repo. This would only happen if the main
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-28 08:41:40 -0800:
Jim, great stuff. A couple suggestions inline :)
On 02/26/2015 09:59 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
A tenant may optionally specify repos from which it may derive its
configuration. In this manner, a repo may keep its Zuul
Hi,
I've been wanting to make some structural changes to Zuul to round it
out into a coherent system. I don't want to change it too much, but I'd
also like a clean break with some of the baggage we've been carrying
around from earlier decisions, and I want it to be able to continue to
scale up
Thanks Jim. This makes a lot of sense and will hopefully make things
simpler and more robust.
Just a few questions:
1. It looks like zuul can request a specific set of nodes for a job. Do
you envision the typical ansible playbook to install additional things
required for the jobs? or would
On 02/26/2015 05:41 PM, Zaro wrote:
Thanks Jim. This makes a lot of sense and will hopefully make things
simpler and more robust.
Just a few questions:
I am not Jim - but I'm going to answer anyway ...
1. It looks like zuul can request a specific set of nodes for a job. Do
you envision
