for updates.
We look forward to seeing you in Paris!
--
Stefano Maffulli
OpenStack Foundation
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
hello folks
at the Foundation we've started a new project to provide OpenID to our
systems. One of the first tasks is to collect the full list of sites
that nowadays depend on Launchpad ID. Can you please help me complete
the list below?
1) review.openstack.org
2) summit.openstack.org
3)
On Tue 24 Sep 2013 03:04:32 PM PDT, Robert Collins wrote:
Indeed! Please please please *do not* stand up yet another
password-hosting site. Utter waste of everyone's time.
I agree with you: we don't nee more complexity. Having our own OpenID
provider is needed in order to *reduce* complexity.
On 09/24/2013 04:47 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
To be clear, I think it's a TERRIBLE idea to move half-way while we
still require launchpad ids for bugs.
Let's hurry up with Storyboard then: the Foundation is setting the
budget for 2014, although I wonder if we can outsource that
development...
On 10/10/2013 09:22 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
To help make the design summit more productive, I have set up a simple
test Pootle server so that we can examine it and answer any questions we
might have before the design summit.
It looks like the system works, I signed up for it too :)
One of
Hello folks,
Under article 7.1 (a) of the Foundation bylaws, the Foundation is
mandated to
accept contributions of software made pursuant to the terms of the
Contributor License Agreements attached as Appendix 7.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/Bylaws#appendix7
On 10/28/2013 07:47 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
There wouldn't really be any way to enforce anything with this, it
would only be best-effort on behalf of the CCLA signatories.
This I understand and I think best-effort is good enough, as I can't see
of any way we can force people that commit
[moving the thread to openstack-legal. Please reply to that list only.]
On 10/28/2013 10:09 AM, Antoine Musso wrote:
I did not feel like hijacking the Corporate CLAs thread, so spamming
you guys with my own personal case.
I'm sure you're not the only one with similar corner cases.
I am an
On 11/01/2013 05:33 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
I was wondering, since there is a lot of people who cannot attend Design
Sessions, if we can help them to be present at least in some way.
We tried in the past to setup systems to enable remote participation in
a generic way (give a URL per each
On Fri 01 Nov 2013 12:40:44 PM PDT, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Since I have quite good experience with using these hangouts on air, I
wanted to propose it as a general way how to get our sessions more
accessible. Lot of people are asking how they can get more involved
and I received very positive
On 11/12/2013 10:12 PM, Tom Fifield wrote:
I'm looking at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/1246879
and I wanted to confirm some design details with you.
1) to do this is a new script in jeepyb ?
2) to find out whether someone is a first time committer is an SQL
query,
Hi Prasanna
On 11/25/2013 10:42 PM, Prasanna Viswakumar wrote:
I placed a request sometime ago to get myself enrolled to the Trystack
facebook group
so that I can start to use TryStack. We need this as we plan to integrate
OpenStack
with one of our products.
this group doesn't manage
On 03/24/2014 02:30 PM, Spencer Krum wrote:
Do we want to get a cname for puppetboard.openstack.org
http://puppetboard.openstack.org or continue using
puppetdb.openstack.org http://puppetdb.openstack.org ?
please do that: it's so much easier to remember that way.
/stef
--
Ask and answer
Hello folks
I wanted to get your thoughts on the idea to move the whole Bitergia
grimoire engine, scripts, database, etc to the openstack common
infrastructure. I'm sure everybody will want this so the question is
more about resources as in people willing to help Bitergia get their
machinery
Hi Samuel,
On 06/23/2014 07:59 AM, Samuel Bercovici wrote:
When you mention opens source solution, please point to an available
open source hosting that we can use to push the log files into? The
alternative would be to put the 3rd party testing CI system behind a
public IP and this will most
On Thu 26 Jun 2014 04:03:49 PM PDT, stef...@openstack.org wrote:
Dear OpenStack Proposal Bot,
oops :)
No worries, the code is not useful anymore.
/stef
--
Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
On Fri 29 Aug 2014 12:47:00 PM PDT, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
Third-party-request
This list is the new place to request the creation or modification of
your third party account. Note that old requests sent to the
openstack-infra mailing list don't need to be resubmitted, they are
already in
On Fri 29 Aug 2014 03:03:34 PM PDT, James E. Blair wrote:
It's the best way we have right now, until we have time to make it more
self-service. We received one third-party CI request in 2 years, then
we received 88 more in 6 months. Our current process is built around
the old conditions. I
On 11/06/2014 01:27 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Stefano, Loic, infra-team,
Just noticed that there's upstream training content that overlaps with
the infra-manual:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/training-guides/tree/doc/upstream-training
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/
I
On 12/04/2014 01:59 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
If there's now wait to do this, we should just add a short redirect text
and then make the page immutable so that nobody starts editing again.
I don't think this is the best approach. At some point, the pages on docs.o.o
will be changed and will be
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 18:28 +, Csaba Henk wrote:
What we are puzzled on is the license. This is something we have to
figure out before we think of setting up the project. In general it's
understood that Apache License (v2) is preferred. Question:
is that a strict requirement on Stackforge
hello folks,
We would like to provide a greater degree of freedom to individuals who
contribute on behalf of corporations who signed the Corporate CLA. By
allowing corporate managers to maintain list of their authorized
contributors we may be able to remove the need for every individual to
sign
22 matches
Mail list logo
