Zuulv3 is actually Python 3 (I believe 3.5+) already.
Excerpts from Apua A.Aa's message of 2017-12-08 00:38:18 +0800:
> Hi,
>
> As title, is there a plan or road map for Zuul and Nodepool to
> support/migrate to Python3.x currently?
>
>
> Apua
>
___
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-11-01 14:47:20 -0700:
> Hi,
>
> At the PTG we brainstormed a road map for Zuul once we completed the
> infra cutover. I think we're in a position now that we can get back to
> thinking about this, so I've (slightly) cleaned it up and organized it
> here.
>
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-12-01 16:08:00 -0800:
> Tristan Cacqueray writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that the zuulv3 release is approaching, please find below a
> > follow-up on this spec.
> >
> > The current code could use one more patch[0] to untangle the common
> > config from the op
That pipe is meant to be used to make the gear server exit when it is
closed. This way if the parent dies, the gear server will get an EPIPE
and die too. It could have also been used as a graceful stop, but it
looks like stop_gear_server just uses SIGKILL to end it quickly.
Excerpts from Huamin Xu
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-06-28 08:54:30 -0700:
> Monty Taylor writes:
>
> > With that in mind, I believe the path should be for the new server
> > being written for the console-log streaming to be called "zuul-web"
> > and that it should serve the console-log websocket at /console-s
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-06-16 14:15:51 -0500:
> Hey all,
>
> We have an important balancing act going on right now, and we also have
> an increasing number of lovely humans playing in our playbox. (hello
> lovely people!)
>
> The balancing act is that we're in the final pus
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-06-09 13:11:00 -0700:
> Clark Boylan writes:
>
> > I'm wary of this simply because it looks a lot like repeating
> > OpenStack's (now failed) decision to stick web servers in a bunch of
> > python processes then do cooperative multithreading with them along
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-06-09 09:41:37 -0700:
> Monty Taylor writes:
>
> > We should use aiohttp with no extra REST framework.
> >
> > Meaning:
> >
> > - aiohttp serving REST and websocket streaming in a scale-out tier
> > - talking RPC to the scheduler over gear or zk
> > - possib
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-06-09 11:22:03 -0500:
> Hey all!
>
> Tristan has recently pushed up some patches related to providing a Web
> Dashboard for Zuul. We have a web app for nodepool. We already have the
> Github webhook receiver which is inbound http. There have been folk
Excerpts from Jamie Lennox's message of 2017-06-07 11:04:53 +1000:
> On 25 May 2017 at 09:04, James E. Blair wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As part of Zuul v3, we're adding support for GitHub (and later possibly
> > other systems). We want these systems to have access to the full power
> > of cross-pr
Excerpts from Joshua Hesketh's message of 2017-06-02 13:45:00 +1000:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Paul Belanger wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:04:20PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As part of Zuul v3, we're adding support for GitHub (and later possibly
> > > oth
Excerpts from Waldvogel, Sebastian's message of 2017-04-19 16:21:13 +:
> Hello Clark,
>
> Thank you for this info that updating to 2.5.2 is safe.
>
> Unfortunately in our full docker driven CI environment I am using the
> concrete zuul version 2.5.1 and not the latest one.
> So yesterday an
Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-02-14 08:45:34 -0800:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017, at 04:28 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We failed at doing a lunch or dinner together in Barcelona because
> > > ETOOMANYTHINGS. Won
Excerpts from corvus's message of 2017-02-10 17:20:56 -0800:
>
> I think this will be a great opportunity for all of us to work together
> on this and it will provide a solid foundation for us to roll out Zuul
> v3 as it's ready. I'm looking forward to working on this with everyone
> soon!
>
J
Excerpts from Oleksandr Karpenko's message of 2017-01-27 16:46:24 +0100:
> Hello together,
>
> Thanks for your answers.
>
> Yes, we are interested in this feature and ready to contribute. But we
> will need a support from your side for clear understanding how to
> implement it.
>
> My vision i
Excerpts from Karpenko, Oleksandr (Nokia - DE/Ulm)'s message of 2017-01-23
13:24:08 +:
> Hallo together,
>
> Sorry for bothering you but I am not able to find any zuul specific mailing
> list.
> First of all if there is some better place to ask questions, please let me
> know and I will do
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2017-01-13 10:18:41 -0600:
> Hey all,
>
> Part of the rollout plan for zuul v3 involves rolling out the new
> zookpeer-based nodepool launchers before we roll out zuul v3 itself.
> We've mostly spoken about this in a hand-wavy mannr so far, but I think
> we
Excerpts from David Shrewsbury's message of 2016-11-18 09:30:04 -0500:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > Hi! First, thanks everyone for getting things into storyboard and
> > helping us get started parallelizing and tracking the
Hi! First, thanks everyone for getting things into storyboard and
helping us get started parallelizing and tracking the work. It's already
paying dividends.
In the past, I suggested that everyone use this work board:
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/41
The reality is that work boards ar
Up until now the v3 feature branch has been managed mostly in an etherpad
and by manual coordination.
With the team of developers expanding, we need to impose a bit more
structure on the effort.
So, with that, all of the stories and tasks have been added to
Storyboard with the zuulv3 tag.
https:
Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2016-06-28 13:23:25 -0700:
> It is an even year again which means there is a new Ubuntu LTS release
> out (Xenial). We currently have Xenial images building and uploaded and
> the Openstack Ansible and Openstack Puppet groups are both taking
> advantage of t
Excerpts from Tom Fifield's message of 2016-02-11 19:33:46 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> Since about 11th January, wiki.o.o has been under attack by spammers.
>
> They're creating new pages at a rate of more than 50 a day, with titles
> that hint at calling certain phone numbers for various services. As a
>
Excerpts from Jean-Daniel Bonnetot's message of 2015-12-17 01:24:33 -0800:
> Hi infra,
>
> You probably know that the foundation need more ressources for the CI.
> What do you think about pushing spot instances?
> It could be a great solution for our CI and make a smaller step for providers
> to
Whoa, there was no crashing.
I've been the "quarterback" of infra-cloud, but Greg and Colleen have
been the primary players, and their input was extremely valuable in
helping Jim Meyer understand what we need, which is why I asked Greg to
come.
The notes are here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-infra-hpcloud-sunset
Those who attended, please review and fill in notes as needed. Thanks!
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
Excerpts from Anita Kuno's message of 2015-10-26 11:39:46 +0900:
> On 10/26/2015 11:30 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> > Anita Kuno writes:
> >
> >> The current list i have of folks who should gather is Jim Meyer, Monty
> >> Taylor, Jim Blair, Jeremy Stanley, Clark Boylan, Elizabeth Joseph and
> >> m
Excerpts from Antoine Musso's message of 2015-03-10 15:11:18 -0700:
> Hello,
>
> Wikimedia deploys almost everything via Debian Packages, I am wondering
> whether you gals and guys would be interested in providing a Debian
> package for Zuul?
>
>
> For the history, Paul Belanger started packag
And the results:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-W6R6K2T7/
It would appear that 'infra cloud' is far enough ahead of the others,
including a wide margin in front of "discuss further" that I think we
can declare it the winner of this very unscientific survey
Unless someone objects to that
Hi, so some time in the not so distant future we are going to build
ourselves a cloud, which we're tracking here:
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000175
And one of the tasks is to come up with a name.
The two so far are "infra cloud" and "vanilla cloud".
I've setup a quick poll to ge
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-28 08:41:40 -0800:
> Jim, great stuff. A couple suggestions inline :)
>
> On 02/26/2015 09:59 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
> > A tenant may optionally specify repos from which it may derive its
> > configuration. In this manner, a repo may keep its Zuul c
Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of 2015-01-16 05:13:14 -0800:
> On 13 January 2015 at 18:28, Csaba Henk wrote:
>
> > We (Manila developers) plan to start a new side-project that would
> > be hosted on Stackforge. It's tentatively named "Manila Image Project",
> > although it would not necessa
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2014-11-19 19:35:18 -0800:
> On 11/19/2014 09:49 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On 20 November 2014 13:43, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >> On 11/19/2014 07:32 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Jay-
> >>>
> >>> My own UX tests have demonstrated a need for both page
Excerpts from Spencer Krum's message of 2014-11-17 02:36:20 -0800:
> Hi,
>
> I help run a clone of infra and our developers have a desire to land
> 'chicken and egg' patches. What I mean by this is one patchset on one
> project and another patchset on another project such that tests cannot pass
>
Excerpts from jeblair's message of 2014-03-26 13:30:28 -0700:
> Hi,
>
> I recently started looking into running the unit tests with MySQL. I
> pushed the start of a change here to do that:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82872/
>
> In particular, that change implements something we've want
Excerpts from Philip Schwartz's message of 2014-03-17 12:01:29 -0700:
>
> On 3/17/14, 12:59 PM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
> >Being fully aware of the irony, I'll play the devil's advocate:
> >
> >Could you detail why improving Gerrit is not an option ? At first glance
> >its development seemed to b
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2014-03-03 13:52:54 -0800:
> On 2014-03-02 17:49:29 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
> [...]
> > That said, infra isn't spinning up nodes properly, but manual testing
> > brings up nodes just fine with plenty of network speed, so we're not
> > sure what
Excerpts from Mohammad Banikazemi's message of 2014-01-17 14:18:17 -0800:
>
> Thanks Sumit.
>
> I did not particularly care about the vote on my patch as the patch has a
> -2 vote already (until we have our own 3rd party testing set up). I got
> worried that other patches will receive the -1 and
Excerpts from jeblair's message of 2014-01-08 23:59:45 -0700:
> Hi,
>
> When Zuul gets very busy, it can end up launching hundreds of jobs
> nearly simultaneously. Each of them has to perform several git fetch
> operations to obtain the changes needed for testing. They fetch from
> the git repos
Excerpts from jeblair's message of 2013-09-24 10:15:10 -0700:
> Clint Byrum writes:
> > I'd like to suggest that infra develop a play book for dealing
> > with crisis. This is not just for those of you with the power to fix
> > things. This is a public document th
Hello infra rockstars. First and foremost, thank you for keeping the
well oiled machinery of the OpenStack infrastructure running. It is a
marvel of modern engineering, and I am not just saying that because I
am prone to hyperbole.
Last night while the gate was exploding a few of us noticed, and
w
40 matches
Mail list logo
