Perhaps sending that email right before taking a few days off meaning I
couldn't reply straight away wasn't the most helpful ;-)
On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, 02:57 Jeremy Stanley, wrote:
> On 2018-07-04 22:32:53 +0100 (+0100), Darragh Bailey wrote:
> [...]
> > Based on the comments at
what would be needed to allow extensions
around other workflows?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-b
erience first (stability, ease of writing/maintenance &
speed of dev-env bring up come to mind as important)?
Past experience with any config management suggests that when you start
simple it's easy to incrementally improve on the existing approach, but
reserving direction when you hit dead ends is
://review.openstack.org/553978
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
h contents with everything that came
from feature/zuulv3, so no risk that changes get merged at all, whatever
was on the master branch is ignored.
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
On 12 Jan 2018 22:43, "Clark Boylan" <cboy...@sapwetik.org
://etherpad.openstack.org/p/jjb_api_v2.0
Fingers crossed we should be able to get the v2 release out in the next
month, any help that you can give would be appreciated.
Thanks,
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
On 17 October 2017 at 11:04, Artem
reduce the risk of error.
Can you elaborate more on how this reduces risk/errors? Curious in case we
run into a similar scenario in the future.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
___
OpenStack-Infra ma
On 6 September 2017 at 01:26, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote:
> Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently the main issue from end users, is the user experience around
> the
> > UI when looking at job resu
Hi,
Sorry, got distracted and wanted to make some images available to help with
the discussion as we're talking UI.
On 5 September 2017 at 19:43, Clark Boylan <cboy...@sapwetik.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017, at 09:25 AM, Darragh Bailey wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> 1
on #openstack-jjb on freenode.
Happy hacking.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
tion got messed up.
>
> We have fixed it
>
> *From:* Darragh Bailey [mailto:daragh.bai...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 27, 2017 1:28 PM
> *To:* Ram, Rajini <rajini_...@dell.com>
> *Cc:* joshua.hesk...@gmail.com; a...@suse.com; openstack-ironic
> <openstack-iro
__
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack
lugable, is that a hard requirement
that will be added to the spec? or just a possibility?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
ing parameters -> use !include-raw-escape
to escape the script so that when substitution is performed the final
result is contents of the file provided.
Finally:
template job defintion, macro needing parameters -> Where you have a script
that you wish to embed a parameter to be substituted, you
a bit, we will release a new version,
> 0.4.0 with the ZooKeeper based builder. At that point, it would be a
> good idea for anyone running Nodepool to begin using it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim
>
>
Looking forward to checking it out, and hopefully getting involved around
zuul
Think you forgot to Reply-All ;-)
Only spotted that now, while I was waiting for others to chime in and see
different points of view.
On 22 November 2016 at 07:25, Wayne Warren <wa...@puppet.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@
to update_jobs, but tbh I
suspect it's unnecessary complicated. But thought I'd throw it out there.
At the very least I'm going to fix the method so that a call without
passing a list of jobs doesn't cause an exception.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented
imple config
creation
Does it make sense? I'd like to hear other people's opinion on whether it
makes sense to have an explicit API as well as a from_config(cfg) method
when someone would create the config object and then pass it around, or is
it more of a YAGNI?
Since it impacts the API that will
reasonable directions. Thanh has helpfully moved things around so we can
delay landing these without preventing most of the remaining work from
being reviewed and approved.
Chat to you in #openstack-sprint later this afternoon.
Happy reviewing!
>
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is f
.
Chat to you in #openstack-sprint on Friday.
Happy reviewing!
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-b
Hi,
Just realised I forgot to include the date/time in the email (I know it's
available via the virtual sprint wiki page, should have still mentioned it)
Next sprint/sync-up is schedule: 14:00 - 18:00 (UTC) 22nd July
On 20 July 2016 at 12:45, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@gmail.com>
things will
get substantially easier now after this week, hopefully see more landed
outside of the sync-ups from next week.
Chat to you in #openstack-sprint on Friday.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
Took a bit of doing, but worked out what was needed to use #openstack-sprint
Created an entry on the Virtual Sprint wiki page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint
Chat to you all tomorrow.
On 6 July 2016 at 21:01, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@gmail.com>
could wait until the 22nd, naturally can still do normal reviews in the
mean time.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
On 6 Jul 2016 08:31, "Dong Ma" <winterma.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Darragh,
>
> For Mon/Fri
It's starting to sound like Friday would suit people best, I'm happy enough
with that day as well, may have to leave slightly before 17hr utc, but
should be able to be present for most of the time.
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
On 5 Jul
slots is a little late for me but it works.
>>
>>
>>
>
Would moving the time slot an hour earlier on either Mon/Fri suit you
better?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
this would only take 3-4 of these to get the major part of the
rewrite in place.
Thoughts? Does this work for enough other JJB reviewers?
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mai
spec/blueprint that covers changing to use the convert to xml
function in JJB, changes relevant can include a reference, otherwise lets
keep the commit messages focused on the change itself.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
The 1.652.x series is an lts release, so fixes were backported to it that
are not in subsequent dev releases.
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
On 14 Jun 2016 20:02, "Zaro" <zaro0...@gmail.com>
Doh! It's called not using windows enough.
The os.rename() it appears throws an error on windows if the target file
exists.
We need to catch that and remove the file, then retry, or remove the old
file first.
The fun of cross platform.
Sorry about that.
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is fool
ugin or role based authentication
plugin is needed, it would be important to be able to call this out in the
documentation.
That way if you don't want to make this information directly available to
JJB, you could still allow an approved script (that runs with higher
privileges) to be run as a
nstack-infra/system-config/tree/modules/openstack_project/files/logstash/jenkins-log-client.yaml#n31
>
> --
> Jonathan Harker
>
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
Op
t;>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>
>
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool"
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
Sorry forgot use reply-all.
Also slight mistake below, ignore my comment about needing to look at
deep_format. I'm pretty certain that it's just the dimensions piece you
want to look at. Assuming I understand your intent correctly.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Darragh Bailey
bled' as a special case.
* If the decision is to change behaviour going forward, initially
needs to only apply to new settings being added and have a way of
converting existing code while matching existing behaviour via some
setting.
Expect we'll have to support existing
p://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
>>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-Infra mailing list
> OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
--
Darragh Ba
gt;>
>> On 9 January 2016 at 07:10, Darragh Bailey <daragh.bai...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 Jan 2016 21:47, "Thanh Ha" <thanh...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > (I truncated some of the repet
7.9
I'll look to check with pyenv on Monday to go over a few python versions.
--
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://
.
-i
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/212246
___
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
--
Darragh Bailey
Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently
I believe the its-* plugins for gerrit could handle this for you, recently
someone mentioned on the repo mailing list that you can even exclude
branches from the requirement.
I'd suggest asking there directly if you haven't already.
Darragh
On 23 Mar 2015 22:17, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org
.
To that group I would like to add Darragh Bailey:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Darragh+Bailey%22+project:openstack-infra/jenkins-job-builder,n,z
-Jim
Thanks for the nomination Jim, I'm enjoying working on JJB immensely and
hope that I can continue to contribute in a way that others
in the yaml into separate files, which can then be included
by the yaml loading in JJB in a transparent manner.
This in turn makes it much easier to separate code (scripts) from
configuration (yaml) and subsequently test your scripts directly.
--
Darragh Bailey
Nothing is foolproof
42 matches
Mail list logo
