Think you forgot to Reply-All ;-)
Only spotted that now, while I was waiting for others to chime in and see
different points of view.
On 22 November 2016 at 07:25, Wayne Warren wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Darragh Bailey
> wrote:
>
(Starting a second reply for a different patch to make it easier to follow
with threaded mail clients)
I've a comment in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319616/8/jenkins_jobs/builder.py that
notes if an application made a call to 'JenkinsManager.update_jobs()' it
would be a reasonable
Hi,
On 11 November 2016 at 14:59, Thanh Ha wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Wayne Warren wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Thanh Ha
>> wrote:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/358019 Support
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Wayne Warren wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Thanh Ha
> wrote:
>
>> There's 2 patches that need one more core-review to get merged so
>> hopefully someone can take a look at them soon:
>>
>>
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Thanh Ha
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'd like to keep the momentum of JJB 2.0 work going as we're so close to
> the finish line. This Friday we're going to continue our sprint in
> #openstack-sprint for those who can make it. Wayne
Hi Everyone,
I'd like to keep the momentum of JJB 2.0 work going as we're so close to
the finish line. This Friday we're going to continue our sprint in
#openstack-sprint for those who can make it. Wayne suggested we send a
status to the mailing list for those who can't.
To summarize some of the
Hi,
Quick reminder that today is the fourth planned sync up for JJB v2.0 api
patches.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint
Time: August 19th 14:00 - 18:00 (UTC) - this friday
Venue: #openstack-meeting (IRC)
Not quite ready to land all of the remaining patches for
Hi,
Quick reminder that we're approaching the third planned sync up for JJB v2.0
api patches.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint
Time: August 5th 14:00 - 18:00 (UTC) - this friday
Venue: #openstack-meeting (IRC)
Seen some great work in the first two sync-ups
Hi,
Just realised I forgot to include the date/time in the email (I know it's
available via the virtual sprint wiki page, should have still mentioned it)
Next sprint/sync-up is schedule: 14:00 - 18:00 (UTC) 22nd July
On 20 July 2016 at 12:45, Darragh Bailey wrote:
>
Hi,
Quick reminder that we're approaching the second planned sync up for JJB
v2.0 api patches.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/jjb_api_v2.0 contains a list of 7 patches
that I'd like us to get close to merging.
The first
Took a bit of doing, but worked out what was needed to use #openstack-sprint
Created an entry on the Virtual Sprint wiki page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#JJB_V2.0_API_Sprint
Chat to you all tomorrow.
On 6 July 2016 at 21:01, Darragh Bailey wrote:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:43:14PM +0100, Darragh Bailey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> To try and minimise trashing of both core reviews and V2.0 patch author(s),
> I'd like to propose that we pick a time/day every second week for 3-4
> iterations where those interested set aside a set block of time to
>
I am fine with starting this Friday. I am also okay with starting any time
afterwards too.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Darragh Bailey
wrote:
>
> Sounds like Friday is the clear winner. Do we want to stay this Friday? Or
> would everyone prefer a bit more notice to
Sounds like Friday is the clear winner. Do we want to stay this Friday? Or
would everyone prefer a bit more notice to plan things with their other
work?
I'm not around Friday 15th, but it could start then anyway if others are
happy (might need one more core to help land stuff that day)? Otherwise
Hey Darragh,
For Mon/Fri, the current time slots both works for me.
Thanks,
Dong
>> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Dong Ma wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Darragh,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with your thought and would like to participate to the reviews,
>>> although the time slots
It's starting to sound like Friday would suit people best, I'm happy enough
with that day as well, may have to leave slightly before 17hr utc, but
should be able to be present for most of the time.
Darragh Bailey
"Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool" - unknown
On 5 Jul 2016
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Darragh Bailey
wrote:
>
>
> On 5 July 2016 at 05:44, Kien Ha wrote:
>
>> HI Darragh,
>>
>> I would like to help where I can in the reviews, but Tuesdays and
>> Thursdays are my busiest days. I can only guarantee that
On 5 July 2016 at 05:44, Kien Ha wrote:
> HI Darragh,
>
> I would like to help where I can in the reviews, but Tuesdays and
> Thursdays are my busiest days. I can only guarantee that I am free after
> 19:00 UTC on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Monday and Fridays are days where I
HI Darragh,
I would like to help where I can in the reviews, but Tuesdays and Thursdays
are my busiest days. I can only guarantee that I am free after 19:00 UTC on
Tuesdays and Thursdays. Monday and Fridays are days where I am free from
summer class obligations but I am not too sure if that will
Hey Darragh,
I agree with your thought and would like to participate to the reviews,
although the time slots is a little late for me but it works.
Thanks,
Dong Ma (Vincent)
Email: winterma.d...@gmail.com
IRC: larainema
Telephone: +86 18610023880
2016-07-05 0:43 GMT+08:00 Darragh
Hi,
To try and minimise trashing of both core reviews and V2.0 patch author(s),
I'd like to propose that we pick a time/day every second week for 3-4
iterations where those interested set aside a set block of time to
collaborate in getting the main rework patches landed. Consider it a set of
21 matches
Mail list logo