>If they're not listed anywhere, I suppose that nobody follows up on the
sizing until something breaks?
I have been introspecting the infra mirror on FortNebula to determine if
there is any last little bit of performance to be gained.
Its also publicly tracked here
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Shadi Akiki wrote:
> > the sizing details for control plane servers are not really listed anywhere
>
> If they're not listed anywhere, I suppose that nobody follows up on the
> sizing until something breaks?
>
> > Sometimes the cloud provider will provide us
>
> the sizing details for control plane servers are not really listed anywhere
If they're not listed anywhere, I suppose that nobody follows up on the
sizing until something breaks?
Sometimes the cloud provider will provide us with custom flavors, or ask us
> to use a particular variant
Why
Thanks Clark and Mohammed.
What I'm looking for is potential savings in resources behind the published
openstack infra.
For example, if I focus on the ask.openstack.org service (powering the Q
website), I'm looking for
1- whether or not the ask.openstack.org server is oversized. This is
answered
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Shadi Akiki wrote:
> Hello. I've been going through the opensource infrastructure
> configurations at https://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/
> and linked from https://opensourceinfra.org/
>
> I don't see any information about server sizes.
> Is this
You can see them listed here:
https://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/contribute-cloud.html
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 12:45 PM Shadi Akiki wrote:
>
> Hello. I've been going through the opensource infrastructure configurations
> at https://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/
> and
