On 02/06/2015 09:14 PM, Marcos Garcia wrote:
It does look like that. However, the intent here is to allow
non-developer
members of a Telco provide the use cases they need to accomplish.
This way
the Telco WG can identify gaps and file a proper spec into each of the
OpenStack projects.
I am setting up a demo openstack environment to integrate with a switch
stack for our organization.
I was just curious if anyone had any preferences on low power / low cost
small form factor embedded devices for running openstack compute nodes on?
I was tempted to just use some beagle bones or
http://www.tranquilpcshop.co.uk/cluster/ orange box or milder looking black
box, 10 NUCs and net.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:54 PM, David Medberry openst...@medberry.net
wrote:
Hi guys,
The Ubuntu Orange box also uses NUCs so seem to be a good choice. I
believe there are a variety of good
I’ve been building out a small cluster of intel NUC’s and have been quite happy
with them – reasonable performance, 16g ram, and usb3 if you need storage.
Great little machines, make sure you update the firmware!
We did a talk on the setup 2 summits ago, and we’re looking to provide an
update
I was looking at the NUCs as well. I think I may go that route.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Will Snow (wasnow) was...@cisco.com wrote:
I’ve been building out a small cluster of intel NUC’s and have been
quite happy with them – reasonable performance, 16g ram, and usb3 if you
need
Hi guys,
The Ubuntu Orange box also uses NUCs so seem to be a good choice. I believe
there are a variety of good Small Form Factor AIO computers that will fill
the bill but NUC is the best known.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Will Snow (wasnow) was...@cisco.com wrote:
I went with the 54250
Hello everyone,
we are currently facing the issue that we don’t know how to proceed with
our telco WG use cases. There are many of them already defined but the
reviews via Etherpad doesn’t seem to work.
I suggest to do a review on them with the usual OpenStack tooling.
Therefore I uploaded one
- Original Message -
From: George Shuklin george.shuk...@gmail.com
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Sorry guys. I think most of the ops here have no idea what you talking
about. Telcos is telcos, ops is ops. Different worlds, different
problems, different terminology.
Hi
OpenStack L naming poll
We'd like your help again in selecting the right name for the
development cycle and release coming after Kilo. Our next summit will
happen in Vancouver, BC (Canada) in May. L candidate names were
proposed, selected and checked for various issues... leaving 4
candidates on
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:25 AM, George Shuklin
george.shuk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/06/2015 04:12 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From: George Shuklin george.shuk...@gmail.com
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Sorry guys. I think most of the ops here have
On 2/6/15 12:09 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Belanger [mailto:paul.belan...@polybeacon.com]
Sent: 06 February 2015 18:52
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [Telco][NFV][infra] Review process of
- Original Message -
From: Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com
To: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:25 AM, George Shuklin
george.shuk...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/06/2015 04:12 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
12 matches
Mail list logo
