Re: [Openstack-operators] [eu] European Operators Meetup February 15th/16th 2016

All, Isn't this exciting! :) A round of applause to Matt and the team who've been working hard over the past couple months to get our first mid-cycle ops meetup in the EU happening. You'll note that there's a token 10 pound fee for registration for this one. This is based on our previous

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-ansible] Mitaka Summit Summary

Hi everyone, I've put together some thoughts based on the Mitaka Summit from the OpenStack-Ansible point of view: http://odyssey4me.github.io/openstack/ansible/mitaka/summit/2015/11/17/mitaka-summit.html Please feel free to ping me with any feedback! Thanks, -- Jesse Pretorius IRC: odyssey4me

Re: [Openstack-operators] Consensus? Re: OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Why can't we have both? I would like to see a regular regional OPS meetup, apart from the offical OPS meetup. I can understand the pain of folks who would love to attend such an event/forum but cannot due to limitations due to distance, visas, travel. Not many can justify to their management such

[Openstack-operators] Running mixed stuff Juno & Kilo , Was: cinder-api with rbd driver ignores ceph.conf

Hello there, I need to quickly find a workaround to be able to use ceph object map features for cinder volumes with rbd backend. However, upgrading everything from Juno to Kilo will require a lot of time for testing and updating all my puppet modules. Do you think it is feasible to start

Re: [Openstack-operators] Running mixed stuff Juno & Kilo , Was: cinder-api with rbd driver ignores ceph.conf

If you are doing this on the same server you are going to have many many issues with olso.* libs being incompatible between releases (not just juno -> kilo but all releases). I don't have specific knowledge around cinder, however on separate machines/vm's we have run mismatched versions of

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] Mirantis Fuel Multi-Region

Hi Folks Let me comment on a couple of things. Multiregion support is possible from deployment side. You need to pass a region parameter to corresponding nodes being deployed. It is a part of detached services feature which is delivered through plugins: "

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops][tools-generic] Coding Standards/Coding Linters for tools-generic

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:56 PM, JJ Asghar wrote: > Yep, that's the can o'worms I was talking about. I was thinking that we > could just steal this .rubocop.yml[1], as it's a "sane" default for us > at Chef. If you take a look at it you'll see its pretty simple which is > what

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

If only there we some kind of chat medium where people could listen in to the live meetup and follow along in chat… Seriously though, how hard is it to find/designate someone as an IRC translator for the main points of discussion? Probably not ideal, but better than nothing. There has to be

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Donald Talton wrote: > I’ll +1 option 1 too, if we can get remote participation that would > suffice. > > > Having been to several of these I think that we can call remote participation a stretch goal at best, and if I'm being honest, I

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops][tools-generic] Coding Standards/Coding Linters for tools-generic

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/16/15 7:43 PM, Clayton O'Neill wrote: > I think it’s a good idea. I think scripts and such that don’t pass the > listing tools can go into the contrib repos and if they get cleaned up > then they can move over to the regular ones. Yep!

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Following up to what Matt said, even for the service (nova, cinder, etc) mid-cycles I've been in, typically only 1 or 2 folks participate remotely and they make sure to have someone pay attention/alert them when their topics are coming up. I don't think remote/virtual scales beyond 1-2 remote

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Donald Talton wrote: > If only there we some kind of chat medium where people could listen in to > the live meetup and follow along in chat… > > > > Seriously though, how hard is it to find/designate someone as an IRC > translator for the

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > Lets calm down the negative positioning here. > Sorry, I wasn't trying to be uppity. I was merely suggesting that we not throw in the towel without giving it some thought and at least come up with some sort of pilot program

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

>From my perspective we're happy to put in place anything that we can reasonably do, and that will increase participation. Bear in mind that we don't have massive amounts of money or people - the costs of the event as it stands is just about covered by the sponsors we have, and I'm putting most of

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/17/15 1:34 PM, Matt Jarvis wrote: > From my perspective we're happy to put in place anything that we > can reasonably do, and that will increase participation. Bear in > mind that we don't have massive amounts of money or people - the > costs

[Openstack-operators] [nfv][telco][product] Future of telco working group and weekly meeting reminder

Hi all, Back in Vancouver [1] we began discussing the growing overlap between OPNFV requirements projects and the current mission of the telco working group. During this period the product working group, also in part focused on recording and prioritizing user stories, has also been hitting its

Re: [Openstack-operators] Invitation to Ops session in Okinawa Open Days in Dec

Hi, Besides the discussion on the regional ops meetups, as for the asia region, I believe we are still in the stage where we need to raise more attention from regional operators and I hope this event would be a step forward. Some updates for the event. - Registration is now open.

Re: [Openstack-operators] Mirantis Fuel Multi-Region

On 17-11-2015 10:40, Federico Michele Facca wrote: > Hi Eren, Hello Federico > afaik, with the new plugin architecture, in fuel 7/8 it should be easy to > create a plugin for achieve your goal. > in case of manual job, depending on your cloud architecture there are > different > options, the

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I think Tim raises a very valid point, and this was exactly the reason why I put together the European Ops meetup to start with. There are a lot of operators in Europe who aren't getting involved in the Ops meetups at the minute, even at the Summits, for many different reasons including logistical

Re: [Openstack-operators] Mirantis Fuel Multi-Region

+ openstack-dev mailing list to bring more Fuel audience. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Federico Michele Facca < federico.fa...@create-net.org> wrote: > Hi, > as said, you need to do manual changes to your deployed nodes. > then you will have to: > - synch your galera cluster across the two

Re: [Openstack-operators] Mirantis Fuel Multi-Region

Hi, as said, you need to do manual changes to your deployed nodes. then you will have to: - synch your galera cluster across the two dc - configure properly the load balancers - configure the memcached configuration - register the services of the second region on the new shared keystone Br,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Mirantis Fuel Multi-Region

Hi Eren, afaik, with the new plugin architecture, in fuel 7/8 it should be easy to create a plugin for achieve your goal. in case of manual job, depending on your cloud architecture there are different options, the main ones are: - you keep a single keystone in a datacenter and register the new

[Openstack-operators] Mirantis Fuel Multi-Region

Hello operators, I have google a lot but I failed to find a good documentation on multi-region installation using Mirantis Fuel. I use Fuel in one site, it provides a decent way to provision the physical machines. However, I need a new region installation and I am wondering how it is done

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Erik McCormick wrote: > We're deciding not to innovate a solution to allow people to > participate in a group that is attempting to provide innovative ideas. > How ironic. I actually don't think it would require much innovation. >

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I agree with all of the points that are being raised, but the inverse has been true for most of the European operators at every other midcycle. And the same presumably applies to the Asian operators. As OpenStack goes global, we need to find ways of bringing all those voices into the conversation.

Re: [Openstack-operators] Invitation to Ops session in Okinawa Open Days in Dec

Hello All, I personal would love to attend it. Unfortunately, it is quite hard to invest on the trip and all the expenses. I would love to provide feedback on the etherpad. Have a blast of event! Edgar Magana, PhD. Cloud Operations Architect Workday, Inc. On 11/17/15, 6:12 PM, "Shintaro