Hi Kazu,
thanks for this update. Sorry I am a bit late in replying to this thread,
but one of my students just ran into an issue running pacemaker-based
evacuation of hosts. It seems that pacemaker 1.1.10 is not supposed to work
with remote, and the 14.04 distro comes with that version.
Did you
Dear Users and Operators,
This is a kind reminder for the User Committee IRC meeting that will be hosted
today Monday 04/11, 2016 at 1900 UTC in (freenode) #openstack-meeting
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/UserCommittee
Thank you all!
Edgar
Sean,
This is a very good concern. I can't talk for all projects but during the Ops
Meet-ups we normally collect the feedback and send it to the PTLs or anyone
from the project team who can help us.
The best answer should be provide by the Product Working Group from User
Committee:
LDT is large deployment team, its a working group for large deployments. Like
Rackspace, Cern, NeCTAR, Yahoo, GoDaddy, Bluebox. Talk about issues scaling
openstack, Nova cells, monitoring, all the stuff that becomes hard when you
have thousands of servers or hundreds of clouds. Also, the
Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
> You mean outside of the LDT filing an RFE bug with neutron to get
Sorry, I don't know what LDT is. Can you explain?
As for the RFE bug and the contributions that GoDaddy has been involved
with, my statement is not about "if" operators are contributing, because
obviously
You mean outside of the LDT filing an RFE bug with neutron to get
segmented/routed network support added to neutron complete with an etherpad of
all the ways we are using that at our companies and our use cases [1] . Or
where we (GoDaddy) came to the neutron Mid-cycle in Fort Collins to
All,
I have a working Kilo cloud running with ceph for the storage backend. I'd
like to use RBD snapshots for backups because they're so fast, but cinder
doesn't allow volume deletion when an RBD snapshot exists. I want to keep
daily backups in case a user terminates an instance and we need
To be blunt: Are we ensuring that all this work that people are
capturing in these working groups is actually getting updated and
communicated to the developers?
As I become more involved with rolling upgrades, I will try and attend
meetings and be available from the WG side, but I don't believe
