Re: [Openstack-operators] Barcelona Ops Meetup Planning

2016-10-04 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi all, I've just had a look at this with a view to adding 10 minutes somewhere on what to do with the hypervisor tuning guide, but I see the free-form notes on the etherpad have been marked as "Old", so figure it's better to discuss here first... Could maybe fit under ops-nova or ops-hardware?

Re: [Openstack-operators] Rados Gateway to Swift migration

2016-10-04 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Nice! But I'm curious, why the need to migrate? On 5 October 2016 at 13:29, Xav Paice wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 13:28 +1300, Xav Paice wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 17:48 -0600, Curtis wrote: >> > Maybe you have someone on staff who loves writing lua (for haproxy)? :)

Re: [Openstack-operators] Rados Gateway to Swift migration

2016-10-04 Thread Xav Paice
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 17:48 -0600, Curtis wrote: > Maybe you have someone on staff who loves writing lua (for haproxy)? :) > Well, maybe not that far, but yeah we're now thinking down that route. If we get there, I'll quickly write something up about it. Many thanks for the suggestion :)

Re: [Openstack-operators] Rados Gateway to Swift migration

2016-10-04 Thread Curtis
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Xav Paice wrote: > On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 07:18 -0600, Curtis wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Xav Paice wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > We're in the process of migrating our object storage from Rados Gateway >> > to

Re: [Openstack-operators] Rados Gateway to Swift migration

2016-10-04 Thread Xav Paice
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 21:56 +, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > OpenStack really needs a way to have a control api for selecting a swift > "flavor", and letting you have multiple swift endpoints within, so swift the > software, radowgw, and vendor endpoints can all co'exist. > Just thinking about it,

Re: [Openstack-operators] Rados Gateway to Swift migration

2016-10-04 Thread Fox, Kevin M
OpenStack really needs a way to have a control api for selecting a swift "flavor", and letting you have multiple swift endpoints within, so swift the software, radowgw, and vendor endpoints can all co'exist. Kevin From: Xav Paice [xavpa...@gmail.com]

Re: [Openstack-operators] Rados Gateway to Swift migration

2016-10-04 Thread Xav Paice
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 07:18 -0600, Curtis wrote: > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Xav Paice wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We're in the process of migrating our object storage from Rados Gateway > > to Swift, and I was wondering if anyone has experiences with the data > > migration

Re: [Openstack-operators] [scientific][scientific-wg][Massively Distributed] - Workshop on Openstack-Federated Identity integration

2016-10-04 Thread lebre . adrien
Hi Saverio, I'm wondering whether you are aware of the massively distributed Working Group [1]. We are currently defining the agenda for our working sessions [2]. According to your email (in particular the use-case you raised), the topic is interesting and can be discussed during one of the

[Openstack-operators] [mitaka] Nova, Neutron and dns_name

2016-10-04 Thread Sergio Morales Acuña
Hi. I'm facing a problem related to dns_name and dnsmasq. Nova and Neutron can create a port with dns_name and dnsmasq it's correctly updating "/addn_host". The problem is when Nova boot an instance using a new or previusly created port. The port has the correct dns_name but dnsmaq (dhcp_agent)

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Meeting Reminder

2016-10-04 Thread Saverio Proto
sorry I will not make it today saverio Il 04 ott 2016 4:42 PM, "Melvin Hillsman" ha scritto: > #openstack-operators > > -- > Melvin Hillsman > Ops Technical Lead > OpenStack Innovation Center > mrhills...@gmail.com > phone: (210)

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Meeting Reminder

2016-10-04 Thread Melvin Hillsman
#openstack-operators -- Melvin Hillsman Ops Technical Lead OpenStack Innovation Center mrhills...@gmail.com phone: (210) 312-1267 mobile: (210) 413-1659 Learner | Ideation | Belief | Responsibility | Command http://osic.org On 10/4/16, 9:39 AM, "Edgar

Re: [Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Meeting Reminder

2016-10-04 Thread Edgar Magana
Hello All, I am trying to join the meeting but I am not sure which IRC channel you use. Edgar On 10/4/16, 5:30 AM, "Matt Van Winkle" wrote: Hey Ops Meetup folks, Gentle reminder that the meeting is in about 1.5 hours at 14:00 UTC. I won’t be able to make

[Openstack-operators] [interop-challenge]Patch set review for interop-challenge

2016-10-04 Thread Tong Li
Can someone please review the patch set for the interop challenge effort? Thanks. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/379116/ Tong Li IBM Open Technology Building 501/B205 liton...@us.ibm.com ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list

[Openstack-operators] [Performance] No Performance Team meeting today

2016-10-04 Thread Dina Belova
Folks, due to the internal training big part of Mirantis won't be able to attend the meeting. Let's skip this for today. Sorry for inconvenience. Cheers, Dina -- *Dina Belova* *Senior Software Engineer* Mirantis, Inc. 525 Almanor Avenue, 4th Floor Sunnyvale, CA 94085 *Phone:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Rados Gateway to Swift migration

2016-10-04 Thread Curtis
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Xav Paice wrote: > Hi, > > We're in the process of migrating our object storage from Rados Gateway > to Swift, and I was wondering if anyone has experiences with the data > migration steps from one to the other? > > In particular, we're

[Openstack-operators] Ops Meetups Team - Meeting Reminder

2016-10-04 Thread Matt Van Winkle
Hey Ops Meetup folks, Gentle reminder that the meeting is in about 1.5 hours at 14:00 UTC. I won’t be able to make it because of an all-day planning meeting. Hopefully, Tom will be around to help manage the chaos. Edgar should be joining to talk about the UC sessions and how we can help with

Re: [Openstack-operators] SDN for hybridcloud, does it *really* exist?

2016-10-04 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi Jonathan, There's also Calico [1,2], which in its simplest form (and as currently implemented): - uses just IP routing (v4 and/or v6)‎ to connect workloads (VMs / containers / pods / bare metal) - has a security model that works across workloads hosted in different clouds, and so can specify