Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC - hierarchical quota models

On 03/08/2017 07:12 AM, Tim Bell wrote: On 7 Mar 2017, at 11:52, Sean Dague wrote: One of the things that came out of the PTG was perhaps a new path forward on hierarchical limits that involves storing of limits in keystone doing counting on the projects. Members of the

[Openstack-operators] Milano session on Fault Injection and Remediation.

Here the skeleton for the Session: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-fault-injection-and-remediation Please provide input/feedback, the intent is to cover anything related to Fault Management, Reliability and Fault Genes working group. Isaac.

[Openstack-operators] Milano session on Upgrades Patches and Packaging

Hello, I prepared the skeleton for the session about Upgrades Patches and Packaging https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MIL-ops-upgrades-patches-packaging Please contribute to the etherpad with stuff like: * patches that you are carrying in production * patches that you dont manage to get

Re: [Openstack-operators] RFC - hierarchical quota models

> On 7 Mar 2017, at 11:52, Sean Dague wrote: > > One of the things that came out of the PTG was perhaps a new path > forward on hierarchical limits that involves storing of limits in > keystone doing counting on the projects. Members of the developer > community are working