On 2018-08-30 18:08:56 -0500 (-0500), Melvin Hillsman wrote:
[...]
> I also recall us discussing having some documentation or way of
> notifying net new signups of how to interact with the ML
> successfully. An example was having some general guidelines around
> tagging. Also as a maintainer for
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:12:57PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2018-08-31 01:13:58 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote:
> [...]
> > What needs to be done for this is full topic categories support
> > under `options` page so people get to filter emails properly.
> [...]
>
> Unfortunately, topic
I think the more we can reduce the ML sprawl the better. I also recall us
discussing having some documentation or way of notifying net new signups of
how to interact with the ML successfully. An example was having some
general guidelines around tagging. Also as a maintainer for at least one of
the
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2018-08-30 22:49:26 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
I really don't want this. I'm happy with things being sorted in
multiple lists, even though I'm subscribed to multiples.
IMO this is easily solved by tagging. If emails are properly tagged
(which they
On 2018-08-30 22:49:26 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> I really don't want this. I'm happy with things being sorted in
> multiple lists, even though I'm subscribed to multiples.
I understand where you're coming from, and I used to feel similarly.
I was accustomed to communities where
On 2018-08-30 12:57:31 -0600 (-0600), Chris Friesen wrote:
[...]
> Do we want to merge usage and development onto one list? That
> could be a busy list for someone who's just asking a simple usage
> question.
A counterargument though... projecting the number of unique posts to
all four lists
On 2018-08-31 01:13:58 +0800 (+0800), Rico Lin wrote:
[...]
> What needs to be done for this is full topic categories support
> under `options` page so people get to filter emails properly.
[...]
Unfortunately, topic filtering is one of the MM2 features the
Mailman community decided nobody used
On 08/30/2018 08:57 PM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 08/30/2018 11:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
>> The proposal is simple: create a new openstack-discuss mailing list
>> to cover all the above sorts of discussion and stop using the other
>> four.
>
> Do we want to merge usage and development onto
On 08/30/2018 11:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
The proposal is simple: create a new openstack-discuss mailing list
to cover all the above sorts of discussion and stop using the other
four.
Do we want to merge usage and development onto one list? That could be a busy
list for someone who's
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 1:21 PM Julia Kreger
wrote:
> Greetings everyone,
>
> It looks like the most agreeable time on the doodle[1] seems to be
> Tuesday September 4th at 13:00 UTC. Are there any objections to using
> this time?
>
> If not, I'll go ahead and create an etherpad, and setup a
Greetings everyone,
It looks like the most agreeable time on the doodle[1] seems to be
Tuesday September 4th at 13:00 UTC. Are there any objections to using
this time?
If not, I'll go ahead and create an etherpad, and setup a bluejeans
call for that time to enable high bandwidth discussion.
Absolutely support merging.
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and openstack-operators
mailing lists on lists.openstack.org see an increasing amount of
cross-posting and thread fragmentation as conversants attempt to
reach various corners of our community with
I also propose that we merge the interop-wg mailing list also,
as the volume on that list is small but topics posted to it are of
general interest to the community.
Chris Hoge
(Interop WG Secretary, amongst other things)
> On Aug 30, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
> The openstack,
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2018-08-30 17:03:50 +:
> The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and openstack-operators
> mailing lists on lists.openstack.org see an increasing amount of
> cross-posting and thread fragmentation as conversants attempt to
> reach various corners
The openstack, openstack-dev, openstack-sigs and openstack-operators
mailing lists on lists.openstack.org see an increasing amount of
cross-posting and thread fragmentation as conversants attempt to
reach various corners of our community with topics of interest to
one or more (and sometimes all)
> >
> > Yeah it's already on the PTG agenda [1][2]. I started the thread because I
> > wanted to get the ball rolling as early as possible, and with people that
> > won't attend the PTG and/or the Forum, to weigh in on not only the known
> > issues with cross-cell migration but also the things I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo
