Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-08-03 Thread Flint WALRUS
Ok perfect, I’ll have a look at the whole process and try to cleanup all my note and make a clear documentation of them. For the image I just choose to goes the CICD way with DIB and successfully get a centos working image. I’m now facing a SSL handshake issue, but I’ll try to fix it as I

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-08-02 Thread Michael Johnson
Hi there. We track our bugs/RFE in storyboard, but patches go into the OpenStack gerrit. There is a new contributor guide here if you have not contributed to OpenStack before: https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/ As for images, no we don't as an OpenStack group. We have nightly builds here:

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-08-02 Thread Flint WALRUS
Ok ok, I’ll have a look at the guidelines and make some documentation patch proposal once our POC will be working fine. Do I have to propose these patch through storyboard or launchpad ? Oh BTW, one last question, is there an official Octavia Amphora pre-build iso? Thanks for the link. Le mer.

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-08-01 Thread Michael Johnson
Hi Flint, Yes, our documentation follows the OpenStack documentation rules. It is in RestructuredText format. The documentation team has some guides here: https://docs.openstack.org/doc-contrib-guide/rst-conv.html However we can also help with that during the review process. Michael On Tue,

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-08-01 Thread Flint WALRUS
Ok sweet! Many thanks ! Awesome, I’ll be able to continue our deployment with peace in mind. Regarding the documentation patch, does it need to get a specific format or following some guidelines? I’ll compulse all my annotations and push a patch for those points that would need clarification and

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-08-01 Thread Michael Johnson
No worries, happy to share. Answers below. Michael On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:49 PM Flint WALRUS wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Oh ok! That config-drive trick was the missing part! Thanks a lot! Is there a > release target for the API vs config-drive thing? I’ll have a look at an > instance as

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-07-31 Thread Flint WALRUS
Hi Michael, Oh ok! That config-drive trick was the missing part! Thanks a lot! Is there a release target for the API vs config-drive thing? I’ll have a look at an instance as soon as I’ll be able to log into one of my amphora. By the way, three sub-questions remains: 1°/ - What is the best

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-07-31 Thread Michael Johnson
Hi Flint, Happy to help. Right now the list of controller endpoints is pushed at boot time and loaded into the amphora via config drive/nova. In the future we plan to be able to update this list via the amphora API, but it has not been developed yet. I am pretty sure centos is getting the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-07-31 Thread Flint WALRUS
Hi Michael, thanks a lot for that explanation, it’s actually how I envisioned the flow. I’ll have to produce a diagram for my peers understanding, I maybe can share it with you. There is still one point that seems to be a little bit odd to me. How the amphora agent know where to find out the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-07-31 Thread Michael Johnson
Hi Flint, We don't have a logical network diagram at this time (it's still on the to-do list), but I can talk you through it. The Octavia worker, health manager, and housekeeping need to be able to reach the amphora (service VM at this point) over the lb-mgmt-net on TCP 9443. It knows the

[Openstack-operators] [OCTAVIA][KOLLA] - Amphora to control plan communication question.

2018-07-31 Thread Flint WALRUS
Hi Folks, I'm currently deploying the Octavia component into our testing environment which is based on KOLLA. So far I'm quite enjoying it as it is pretty much straight forward (Except for some documentation pitfalls), but I'm now facing a weird and hard to debug situation. I actually have a