Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

2018-01-19 Thread Andrea Frittoli
Hello everyone, After a long holiday break I would like to resume work on bringing the QA SIG to life. I proposed a QA SIG session [0] for the next PTG, but I'm not sure the right audience will be in Dublin. Could you please reply if you are interested but won't be in Dublin or add your name to t

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

2017-11-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Rochelle Grober wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> One question I have is whether we'd need to keep the "QA" project team at >> all. Personally I think it would create confusion to keep it around, for no >> gain. >> SIGs code contributors get voting rights for the TC anyway, and SIGs are free >> to

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

2017-11-17 Thread Rochelle Grober
First off, let me say I think this is a tremendous idea. And, it's perfect for the SIG concept. Next, see inline: Thierry Carrez wrote: > Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > [...] > > during the last summit in Sydney we discussed the possibility of > > creating an OpenStack quality assurance special int

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

2017-11-17 Thread Andrea Frittoli
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:33 PM Thierry Carrez wrote: > Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > [...] > > during the last summit in Sydney we discussed the possibility of > creating an > > OpenStack quality assurance special interest group (OpenStack QA SIG). > > The proposal was discussed during the QA feed