On 10/6/2017 1:30 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
+1
I am also personally frustrated by the same thing clint is,
It seems that somewhere along the line we lost the direction of cloud vs
VPS, and somewhere it was sold (or not sold) that openstack is good for
both (when it really isn't imho),
To: openstack-operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new user_data
during rebuild?
No offense is intended, so please forgive me for the possibly incendiary nature
of what I'm about to write:
VPS is the predecessor of cloud (and something I love very much, and rely
50 PM
> To: openstack-operators
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new
> user_data during rebuild?
>
> No offense is intended, so please forgive me for the possibly incendiary
> nature of what I'm about to write:
>
> VPS is the predecess
i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 5:34 PM
> To: Chris Friesen
> Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new
> user_data during rebuild?
>
>
>
> In our cloud rebuild is the o
PM
> To: Chris Friesen
> Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new
> user_data during rebuild?
>
>
>
> In our cloud rebuild is the only way for a user to keep the same IP.
> Unfortunately, we don't
Excerpts from Chris Friesen's message of 2017-10-04 09:15:28 -0600:
> On 10/03/2017 11:12 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > My personal opinion is that rebuild is an anti-pattern for cloud, and
> > should be frozen and deprecated. It does nothing but complicate Nova
> > and present challenges for
Excerpts from Belmiro Moreira's message of 2017-10-04 17:33:40 +0200:
> In our cloud rebuild is the only way for a user to keep the same IP.
> Unfortunately, we don't offer floating IPs, yet.
> Also, we use the user_data to bootstrap some actions in new instances
> (puppet, ...).
> Considering all
Moreira [mailto:moreira.belmiro.email.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 5:34 PM
To: Chris Friesen
Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new user_data
during rebuild?
In our cloud rebuild is the only way
In our cloud rebuild is the only way for a user to keep the same IP.
Unfortunately, we don't offer floating IPs, yet.
Also, we use the user_data to bootstrap some actions in new instances
(puppet, ...).
Considering all the use-cases for rebuild it would be great if the
user_data can be updated at
On 10/03/2017 11:12 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
My personal opinion is that rebuild is an anti-pattern for cloud, and
should be frozen and deprecated. It does nothing but complicate Nova
and present challenges for scaling.
That said, if it must stay as a feature, I don't think updating the
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 08:29:45PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
:On 2017-10-03 16:19:27 -0400 (-0400), Jonathan Proulx wrote:
:[...]
:> This works in our OpenStack where it's our IP space so PTR record also
:> matches, not so well in public cloud where we can reserve an IP and
:> set forward DNS
On 2017-10-03 16:19:27 -0400 (-0400), Jonathan Proulx wrote:
[...]
> This works in our OpenStack where it's our IP space so PTR record also
> matches, not so well in public cloud where we can reserve an IP and
> set forward DNS but not control its reverse mapping.
[...]
Not that it probably
7 at 19:17
:> To: openstack-operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
:> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new
user_data during rebuild?
:>
:>
:> Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-10-03 10:53:44 -0500:
:>
ck-operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new
> user_data during rebuild?
>
>
> Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-10-03 10:53:44 -0500:
> > We plan on
operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] Should we allow passing new
user_data during rebuild?
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-10-03 10:53:44 -0500:
> We plan on deprecating personality files from the compute API in a new
> micr
Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2017-10-03 10:53:44 -0500:
> We plan on deprecating personality files from the compute API in a new
> microversion. The spec for that is here:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509013/
>
> Today you can pass new personality files to inject during
On 10/3/2017 10:53 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
However, if the only reason one would need to pass personality files
during rebuild is because we don't persist them during the initial
server create, do we really need to also allow passing user_data for
rebuild?
Given personality files were
We plan on deprecating personality files from the compute API in a new
microversion. The spec for that is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509013/
Today you can pass new personality files to inject during rebuild, and
at the PTG we said we'd allow passing new user_data to rebuild as a
18 matches
Mail list logo
