Good news. After finalizing the trademark checks and giving the community time
to weigh in, Mitaka will be the name of the M release.
Thanks again for the great discussion around this topic, and for the
willingness to be responsive to the concerns of fellow community members.
On Jul 9,
+1 from me as well.
2015년 7월 10일 (금) 18:27, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com님이 작성:
On 10/07/15 10:19, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Part of the confusion here is that we are not naming releases. We are
naming release *cycles*. We are giving a name to a period of time,
basically. In that
Adam Lawson wrote:
The alternative of course is to just number the releases since names
ultimately don't mean anything but it seems there are problems with that
level of simplicity. I personally prefer Tristan's suggestion to keep it
as simple as possible. In a few years we'll run out of
On 10/07/15 10:19, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Part of the confusion here is that we are not naming releases. We are
naming release *cycles*. We are giving a name to a period of time,
basically. In that period of time, various version numbers for various
components will be released. Saying Glance
Feel free to give input on the Mitaka proposal.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Bryce [mailto:jbr...@jbryce.com]
Sent: 09 July 2015 20:52
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision
