On 3/21/2018 6:34 AM, 李杰 wrote:
So what should we do then about rebuild the volume backed server?Until
the cinder could re-image a volume?
I've added the spec to the 'stuck reviews' section of the nova meeting
agenda so it can at least get some discussion there next week.
https://wiki.openst
> Deleting all snapshots would seem dangerous though...
>
> 1. I want to reset my instance to how it was before
> 2. I'll just do a snapshot in case I need any data in the future
> 3. rebuild
> 4. oops
Yep, for sure. I think if there are snapshots, we have to refuse to do
te thing. My comment was
Deleting all snapshots would seem dangerous though...
1. I want to reset my instance to how it was before
2. I'll just do a snapshot in case I need any data in the future
3. rebuild
4. oops
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ben Nemec
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for us
> Rather than overload delete_on_termination, could another flag like
> delete_on_rebuild be added?
Isn't delete_on_termination already the field we want? To me, that field
means "nova owns this". If that is true, then we should be able to
re-image the volume (in-place is ideal, IMHO) and if not,
I'm not sure why you're sending this same email *yet again*. There is
already a thread going with the same details and questions below (from
my original response yesterday):
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2018-March/014952.html
Can we please stop spamming the mailing
Hi,all
This spec is proposing to add support for rebuild with a new image
for
volume-backed servers, which today is just a 400 failure in the API
since the compute doesn't support that scenario.
With the proposed solution, the backing root volume would be deleted and
a new volume wo
: Saverio Proto [mailto:ziopr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 3:19 PM
To: Tim Bell; Matt Riedemann
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [nova] about rebuild
instance boo
On 14 March 2018 at 13:46, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 3/14/2018 3:42 AM, 李杰 wrote:
>
>>
>> This is the spec about rebuild a instance booted from
>> volume.In the spec,there is a
>>question about if we should delete the old root_volume.Anyone who
>> is interested in
>>
Please do not default to deleting it, otherwise someone will eventually be
back here asking why an irate user has just lost data. The better scenario
is that the rebuild will fail (early - before impact to the running
instance) with a quota error.
Cheers,
On Thu., 15 Mar. 2018, 00:46 Matt Riedema
My idea is that if delete_on_termination flag is set to False the
Volume should never be deleted by Nova.
my 2 cents
Saverio
2018-03-14 15:10 GMT+01:00 Tim Bell :
> Matt,
>
> To add another scenario and make things even more difficult (sorry (), if the
> original volume has snapshots, I don't t
Matt,
To add another scenario and make things even more difficult (sorry (), if the
original volume has snapshots, I don't think you can delete it.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Matt Riedemann
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Wednesday,
On 3/14/2018 3:42 AM, 李杰 wrote:
This is the spec about rebuild a instance booted from
volume.In the spec,there is a
question about if we should delete the old root_volume.Anyone who
is interested in
booted from volume can help to review this. Any suggestion is
welc
12 matches
Mail list logo