...@godaddy.com wrote:
We¹ve been running the new oslo.messaging under Juno for about the last
month, and we¹ve seen success with it, too.
From: Sam Morrison
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:02 PM
To: David Medberry
Cc: OpenStack Operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] FYI: Rabbit
: [Openstack-operators] FYI: Rabbit Heartbeat Patch Landed
Great, let me know how you get on.
On 1 May 2015, at 12:21 pm, David Medberry openst...@medberry.net
wrote:
Great news Sam. I'll pull those packages into my Juno devel environment
and
see if it makes any difference.
Much appreciated
: OpenStack Operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] FYI: Rabbit Heartbeat Patch Landed
Great, let me know how you get on.
On 1 May 2015, at 12:21 pm, David Medberry openst...@medberry.net
wrote:
Great news Sam. I'll pull those packages into my Juno devel environment
and
see
with it, too.
From: Sam Morrison
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 11:02 PM
To: David Medberry
Cc: OpenStack Operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] FYI: Rabbit Heartbeat Patch Landed
Great, let me know how you get on.
On 1 May 2015, at 12:21 pm, David Medberry openst...@medberry.net wrote
, 2015 at 11:02 PM
To: David Medberry
Cc: OpenStack Operators
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] FYI: Rabbit Heartbeat Patch Landed
Great, let me know how you get on.
On 1 May 2015, at 12:21 pm, David Medberry openst...@medberry.net
wrote:
Great news Sam. I'll pull those packages into my Juno
I managed to get a juno environment with oslo.messaging 1.8.1 working in ubuntu
14.04
I have a debian repo with all the required dependancies at:
deb http://download.rc.nectar.org.au/nectar-ubuntu trusty-juno-testing-oslo main
All it includes is ubuntu official packages from vivid.
Have
Great news Sam. I'll pull those packages into my Juno devel environment and
see if it makes any difference.
Much appreciated for the rebuilds/links.
Also, good to connect with you at ... Connect AU.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Sam Morrison sorri...@gmail.com wrote:
I managed to get a juno
I tried that once as a test, it was pretty much a major fail. This was
behind an F5 too. Just leaving the hosts in a list works better.
On Thursday, March 19, 2015, John Dewey j...@dewey.ws wrote:
Why would anyone want to run rabbit behind haproxy? I get people did it
post the
Why would anyone want to run rabbit behind haproxy? I get people did it post
the ‘rabbit_servers' flag. Allowing the client to detect, handle, and retry is
a far better alternative than load balancer health check intervals.
On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
I
Good point about the hosts, i'd agree with John and Abel.
fyi, some good news in CI testing of oslo.messaging trunk with rest of
components from stable/juno.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165981/
NOTE: CI testing does not exercise rabbitmq going up and down or
multiple rabbit mq hosts, it
I’ve been trying to build a ubuntu deb of this in a juno environment. It’s a
bit of a nightmare as they have changed all the module names from oslo.XXX to
oslo_XXX
Have fixed those up with a few sed replaces and had to remove support for
aioeventlet as the dependencies aren’t in the ubuntu
We have other supporting services that require RabbitMQ and since they only
accept a single host in their connection config, we need a more reliable
way for them to connect. Those services work just fine with
HAProxy/RabbitMQ.
The OpenStack HA guide
Apologies. i was waiting for one more changeset to merge.
Please try oslo.messaging master branch
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/commits/master/
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/commits/master/
(you need at least till Change-Id: I4b729ed1a6ddad2a0e48102852b2ce7d66423eaa
On 3/19/15 10:15 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Apologies. i was waiting for one more changeset to merge.
Please try oslo.messaging master branch
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/commits/master/
(you need at least till Change-Id:
I4b729ed1a6ddad2a0e48102852b2ce7d66423eaa - change id is
At the Operator’s midcycle meetup in Philadelphia recently there was a lot of
operator interest[1] in the idea behind this patch:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146047/
Operators may want to take note that it merged yesterday. Happy testing!
[1] See bottom of
I have been working with dism and sileht on testing this patch in one of
our pre-prod environments. There are still issues with rabbitmq behind
haproxy that we are working through. However, in testing if you are using
a list of hosts you should see significantly better catching/fixing of
faults.
16 matches
Mail list logo
