Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-30 Thread Vincent Legoll
I'm open for suggestions to make this sound better. Thanks for this feedback. That's OK for me, +1 on the other comments in the thread. -- Vincent Legoll EGI FedCloud task force Cloud Computing at IdGC France Grilles / CNRS / IPHC ___

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-27 Thread Joseph Bajin
All the different projects have different ways of reporting bugs and looking for features. You can see a few of the different ways that the Operators discussed back at the Summit here - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/AUS-ops-Requests-for-Enhancement-Process That should give you some more

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-27 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ya, I'd like to make sure that whoever starts applying these messages to bugs automagically takes into account that people may (or may not have) spent a lot of (personal or other) time reporting a bug and take that into account when producing a polite and thankful message to those that have

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-27 Thread Robert Starmer
Seems like a great approach. You might want to also include: This bug was probably not triaged due to lack of information to reproduce the issue. Please include as much information about the problem including steps to allow a developer to reproduce the issue in order for your time in reporting

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-27 Thread Aubrey Wells
Minor, but "This bug report has been closed [...]" sounds much better than "This bug report got closed [...]" - Aubrey Wells Manager, Network Operations Digium Cloud Services Main: 888.305.3850 Support: 877.344.4861 or http://www.digium.com/en/support

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-27 Thread Markus Zoeller
On 27.05.2016 15:47, Vincent Legoll wrote: > Hello, > > Le 27/05/2016 15:25, Markus Zoeller a écrit : >> I don't see a benefit in leaving very old bug reports open when nobody >> is working on it (again, a resource problem). Closing it (with "Won't >> Fix") is explicit and easy to query. The

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-27 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, Le 27/05/2016 15:25, Markus Zoeller a écrit : I don't see a benefit in leaving very old bug reports open when nobody is working on it (again, a resource problem). Closing it (with "Won't Fix") is explicit and easy to query. The information is not lost. This does*not* mean we don't care

Re: [Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-27 Thread Markus Zoeller
Maybe a few more words on this ML *why* I'm doing this. It all comes down to a simple resource problem. Far more bug reports get filed than solved. For the last 3 releases the numbers [1][2][3] are: Kilo Liberty Mitaka Filed Bugs: 1144 926 968

[Openstack-operators] Fwd: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-23 Thread Tom Fifield
FYI - if you have a bug that's been around forever in nova, please follow Markus' instructions Forwarded Message Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months. Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 13:02:29 +0200 From: Markus Zoeller