Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

On 09/28/2015 12:51 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova/neutron etc. Yep, this ^ -jay ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova/neutron etc. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Curtis wrote: > Hi, > > For organizations with the keystone database shared across regions via >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

lx <j...@jonproulx.com> Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & Designate, and a regional cluster for things like nova/neutron etc. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Curtis <serverasc...@gmail

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

OK thanks for the input everyone, much appreciated. Thanks, Curtis. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/28/2015 12:51 PM, Matt Fischer wrote: >> >> Yes. We have a separate DB cluster for global stuff like Keystone & >> Designate, and a regional cluster

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

On 09/08/2015 04:44 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: Hi All, I'm pretty close to opening a second region in my cloud at a second physical location. The plan so far had been to only share keystone between the regions (nova, glance, cinder etc would be distinct) and implement this by using MariaDB

[Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

Hi All, I'm pretty close to opening a second region in my cloud at a second physical location. The plan so far had been to only share keystone between the regions (nova, glance, cinder etc would be distinct) and implement this by using MariaDB with galera replication between sites with each site

Re: [Openstack-operators] Milti-site Keystone & Galera

Thanks Jay & Matt, That's basically what I thought, so I'll keep thinking it :) We're not replicating glance DB because images will be stored in different local Ceph storage on each side so the images won't be directly available. We thought about moving back to a file back end and rsync'ing but