Re: [Openstack-operators] MongoDB as Ceilometer backend - scaling

2016-09-26 Thread gordon chung
Agreed. i'm doing some benchmarking myself currently which i will publish soon. whenever y'all do start testing, we welcome any feedback. On 26/09/2016 4:43 AM, Tobias Urdin wrote: > Hello Gordon, > > I have talked to a lot of different people at various companies, most of > them (including us)

Re: [Openstack-operators] MongoDB as Ceilometer backend - scaling

2016-09-26 Thread Tobias Urdin
Hello Gordon, I have talked to a lot of different people at various companies, most of them (including us) has been looking towards Gnocchi and and surely gonna use it in the future however it's still missing packaging, documentation and production testing (being used in production). Therefore

Re: [Openstack-operators] MongoDB as Ceilometer backend - scaling

2016-09-25 Thread gordon chung
i don't want to speak for rest of Telemetry contributors but i don't think many(any) of us suggest using MongoDB or Ceilometer's API for storage. It is basically a data dump of what Ceilometer is collecting so it will be very, very verbose for most/all use cases. as Joseph mentioned,

Re: [Openstack-operators] MongoDB as Ceilometer backend - scaling

2016-09-17 Thread Joseph Bajin
I think many people tried to run ceilometer with multiple different backends and for a while were truly unsuccessful. If you look at Liberty and now in Mitaka there has been a lot of work to separate out the alarms from the actual data parts. You now have Adoh from the alarming standpoint, and