On 18 Aug 2016, at 22:48, Michael Still
> wrote:
Shelved instances still consume IPs and hypervisor disk IIRC, so they're not
free for nova. So, there has to be some form of accounting of shelved instances
to stop resource exhaustion, especially in
ux Systems Engineer
>
> GoDaddy
>
>
>
> *From: *David Medberry <openst...@medberry.net>
> *Date: *Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 3:49 PM
> *To: *"Jonathan D. Proulx" <j...@csail.mit.edu>
> *Cc: *"openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" <
&g
: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org"
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Shelving
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Jonathan D. Proulx
<j...@csail.mit.edu<mailto:j...@csail.mit.edu>> wrote:
True they do consume IPs.
In my con
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Jonathan D. Proulx
wrote:
>
> True they do consume IPs.
>
> In my configuration they do not consume any hypervisor disk. I
> *think* this is true of all configurations once the 'shelved' systems
> are 'offloaded'.
i concur, that's the
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:48:12AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
:Shelved instances still consume IPs and hypervisor disk IIRC, so they're
:not free for nova. So, there has to be some form of accounting of shelved
:instances to stop resource exhaustion, especially in the IP space.
:
:I'm not opposed
Shelved instances still consume IPs and hypervisor disk IIRC, so they're
not free for nova. So, there has to be some form of accounting of shelved
instances to stop resource exhaustion, especially in the IP space.
I'm not opposed to removing most of their cost from quota, but I don't
think we can
+1
From: Tim Bell [tim.b...@cern.ch]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 10:50 AM
To: Jonathan D. Proulx
Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Shelving
I was interested to establish a consensus that
- Shelved instances
I was interested to establish a consensus that
- Shelved instances should not be part of the users quota
- Quota in Glance (and associated chargeback if appropriate) is needed
Glance space for us is much less expensive than people leaving their instances
running. Equally, terminating a user’s
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:24:28PM +, Tim Bell wrote:
:
:We’re having a look at VM shelving for the CERN community and struggling to
find a motivation for a private cloud user to shelve their instances (and free
up resources they may be only using infrequently).
:
:The problem is that
We’re having a look at VM shelving for the CERN community and struggling to
find a motivation for a private cloud user to shelve their instances (and free
up resources they may be only using infrequently).
The problem is that shelved instances seem to still be included in the user’s
quota.
10 matches
Mail list logo