Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-28 Thread matt
python-openstackclient had a csv output last i checked. On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:40 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > On 28 January 2015 at 06:19, Tim Bell wrote: > >> +1 for commas. Configuration files with JSON is OK but commas for CLIs. >> > > +1 for commas from an operator perspective > >

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-28 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 28 January 2015 at 06:19, Tim Bell wrote: > +1 for commas. Configuration files with JSON is OK but commas for CLIs. > +1 for commas from an operator perspective ___ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lis

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-27 Thread Tim Bell
+1 for commas. Configuration files with JSON is OK but commas for CLIs. Tim From: John Dewey [mailto:j...@dewey.ws] Sent: 27 January 2015 23:12 To: Jesse Keating Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-27 Thread John Dewey
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On 1/27/15 1:54 PM, Sam Morrison wrote: > > Hi operators, > > > > I have a review up to fix this filter to allow multiple tenants, there > > are 2 proposed ways in which this can be specified. > > > > 1. using a comma e.g., tena

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-27 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2015-01-27 5:03 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: Which one do you think is better? What do the other various things that take lists expect? I'd say that's more of a consideration too, uniformity across the inputs. +1 again -- Mathieu ___ OpenStack-o

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-27 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2015-01-27 4:54 PM, Sam Morrison wrote: Hi operators, I have a review up to fix this filter to allow multiple tenants, there are 2 proposed ways in which this can be specified. 1. using a comma e.g., tenantid1,tenantid2 2. Using a json list eg. [“tenantid1”, “tenantid2”] Which one do you th

Re: [Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-27 Thread Jesse Keating
On 1/27/15 1:54 PM, Sam Morrison wrote: Hi operators, I have a review up to fix this filter to allow multiple tenants, there are 2 proposed ways in which this can be specified. 1. using a comma e.g., tenantid1,tenantid2 2. Using a json list eg. [“tenantid1”, “tenantid2”] Which one do you think

[Openstack-operators] Specifying multiple tenants for aggregate_multitenancy_isolation_filter

2015-01-27 Thread Sam Morrison
Hi operators, I have a review up to fix this filter to allow multiple tenants, there are 2 proposed ways in which this can be specified. 1. using a comma e.g., tenantid1,tenantid2 2. Using a json list eg. [“tenantid1”, “tenantid2”] Which one do you think is better? https://review.openstack.org