Gluster for block storage is definitely not a good choice, specially for
VMs and OpenStack in general. Also, there are rumors all over the place
that RedHat will start to "phase out" Gluster in favor of CephFS, the "last
frontier" of the so-called "Unicorn Storage" (Ceph does everything). But
when
Same experience here. Gluster ‘failover’ time was an issue for as well
(rebooting one of the Gluster nodes caused unacceptable locking/timeout for a
period of time). Ceph has worked well for us for both nova-ephemeral and
cinder volume as well as Glance. Just make sure you stay well ahead of
Hello All ,
For a long time we are testing Ceph and today we also want to test GlusterFS
Interesting thing is maybe with single client we can not get IOPS what we
get from ceph cluster . (From ceph getting max 35 K IOPS for % 100 random
write and gluster gave us 15-17K )
But interesting thing
