Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] Seeking feedback: Active User Contributor (AUC) eligibility requirements

Good to have this question clarified. Thanks, Edgar On 7/6/16, 3:18 PM, "Shamail" wrote: > On Jul 6, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Lauren Sell wrote: > > Hi Rocky, > > Agreed! I think that’s the intent of the first bullet — official user group >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] Seeking feedback: Active User Contributor (AUC) eligibility requirements

> On Jul 6, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Lauren Sell wrote: > > Hi Rocky, > > Agreed! I think that’s the intent of the first bullet — official user group > organizers. Completely agree, they are a vital part of the community and often are the first aspect of community that

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] Seeking feedback: Active User Contributor (AUC) eligibility requirements

Umm, I see a major contribution area not included here: OpenStack community meetup organizers. I know some sink a large amount of time scheduling and organizing at least one a month, some two or more. These organizers are critical for getting info out on OpenStack and familiarizing their

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] Seeking feedback: Active User Contributor (AUC) eligibility requirements

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote: > > I'm surprised this hasn't generated more feed back, though I'd > generally take that as positive. > > List seems good to me. > > The self nomintaion + confirm by UC is a good catch all especially in > the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [User-committee] Seeking feedback: Active User Contributor (AUC) eligibility requirements

Shamail Tahir writes: > The AUC Recognition WG has been hard at work on milestone-4 of our > plan which is to identify the eligibility criteria for each community > contributor role that is covered by AUC. > [...] Thank you in advance for your feedback! +1 Looks good, thanks all for the work