Re: [Openstack-operators] glance directory traversal bug and havana

2015-01-07 Thread George Shuklin
I spend few hours trying to backport to Havana, but than I found, that Havana seems be immune to the bug. I'm not 100% sure, so someone else advised to look too. The bug was that icehouse+ accepts all supported schemas. Fix excludes 'bad' schemes. Although Havana have explicitly given list of

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Keystone] LDAP Assignment Backend Use Survey

2015-01-07 Thread Morgan Fainberg
As a note, since I've seen some responses about users and/or groups on this survey, I will be sending a survey about identity out today. This survey is strictly about projects/tenants and roles/role assignments in LDAP. Sent via mobile On Jan 6, 2015, at 11:22, Morgan Fainberg

Re: [Openstack-operators] Neutron DVR HA

2015-01-07 Thread Pedro Sousa
Hi all, after some more tests it seems some gratuitous arp issue because if I start a new connection (ping) from an inside instance to an external host like google it will work. This means that instance advertises the switch that in fact something has changed and it should update arp table.

[Openstack-operators] [Cinder] volume / host relation

2015-01-07 Thread Arne Wiebalck
Hi, Will a Cinder volume creation request ever timeout and be rescheduled in case the host with the volume service it has been scheduled to is not consuming the corresponding message? Similarly: if the host the volume has been created on and to which later the deletion request is scheduled

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Cinder] volume / host relation

2015-01-07 Thread Warren Wang
Your understanding is correct. I have the same problem as well. For now, my plan is to just move cinder-volume to our more robust hosts, and run database changes to modify the host, as needed. I have noticed a growing trend to replace the host parameter with a generic, but I agree that this

Re: [Openstack-operators] Mar 9-10, 2015, Philadelphia, USA - Next Ops Meetup

2015-01-07 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hey Tom, Thanks for organizing this. We're really looking forward to this event. On 29/12/14 02:53 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: Registration and details to come. We'll do our regular etherpad brainstorming, but since some of us are having a well-earned break at the moment, let's hold off on that

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Cinder] volume / host relation

2015-01-07 Thread Amit Das
+1 on the issue faced. We too had to use a generic name and modify db records to make this work. However we had to struggle for couple of days on a multi node setup before digging out the root cause. Worth looping the dev group if they have some alternate suggestions. On 7 Jan 2015 20:45, Warren

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Cinder] volume / host relation

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Smith
+1 in that we experienced this as well. We implemented an HA iscsi cinder and failover from one node to the other works great until you have to do some administrative action on the volume and the mismatched name in the database messes that up. We’ve had to change hostnames in the DB or fail