I agree with all of these items especially with not having Vendor booths.
The only thing I would want to mention is that it would be great to have
something centrally located within the US, if we are going to choose the US
for a session. That way it is only a 3-4 hour flight instead of a 7-9
+1 (we had 2 people at the mid-cycle last time, so we would not have been
impacted by this)
When there are multiple 4+ breakout sessions going on at the same time and they
are all (hopefully) relevant to you/your company? I would agree that if
someone had 20+ people from a single company
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Brendan Johnson
bjohn...@paragusit.com wrote:
What are people using to perform image based backups of Windows and Linux VMs
in OpenStack? I am using KVM as the hypervisor, Ceph for block storage and
Swift for object storage. I know Cinder can backup volumes
This isn¹t completely inside of OpenStack, but you can use something like
R1soft that is installed on an instance inside of your cloud then use that
to connect to other instances to bare metal. We (BlackMesh) have then
created a baremetal instance that ceph volumes can be attached to do full
Tom,
First off, thank you for organizing this event. It has proven to be a
success and the growth shows how much interest there is in the community. A
couple of ideas came to mind when I read your e-mail.
What about breaking the event up into regions? Or having additional
sponsors that are users
I use qemu-guest-agent inside of a vm and ensure that the mounts are noatime.
You can then use the guest agent to issue a freeze and get consistent rbd snaps
of the backing devices. Those snaps can be exported, preferably differentially
to skip over the unused portions, off to some other
Hi Tom, et al,
1) I think corporate operators are fine sponsors (or as I prefer,
underwriters) of the event. But with modest/token acknowledgement only of
their largesse. *
2) No vendor booths. I'm fine with an Oprah sponsorship goodie bag on the
chairs or at registration time, but nothing more
Hi Tom,
I think this is a great problem to have. Difficult to solve, but it shows
how popular / important these meetups are.
I'm definitely in favor of a no booths type meetup. I feel if a company
wants to sponsor, they're doing it out of good will and any recognition
would come from that.
I'd
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Joe Topjian j...@topjian.net wrote:
I wouldn't be opposed to having a paid registration for the meetup. Could
the amount be polled if paid registration is considered?
We (TWC) is also in favor of having paid registration as well as a slush
fund for
+1 on the no booths rule.
-1 on paid registration, I think we need to be mindful of the smaller
openstack deployers, their voice is an important one, and their access to
the larger operations teams is invaluable to them. I like the idea of
local teams showing up because it's in the neighborhood
Hi everyone,
There was quite a bit of fanfare around the new federation features in
OpenStack Kilo.
In the os-ansible-deployment/openstack-ansible project we've been putting
together a view on how to implement federation with as little complexity as
possible.
We've been working on some
Hi Tom, thanks for bringing up the subject. Like many commenters I share
some of the same views.
I'm very +1 on preventing vendor booth space from happening. This isn't
an event to sell a product, booth space would be wasted on both the
attendees and the booth staff.
I feel that multiple
If we have more than one live-migration occurring at a time, some will
fail. Basically the concluding handshake won't complete. It's not clear if
this is a contention issue, and issue in Juno (which has some
well-documented messaging problems), or something else.
These issues occur when trying to
Hello all,
The os-ansible-deployment/OpenStack-Ansible project is gearing up for a couple
feature drops and looking for reviews from interested people within the greater
deployer/operator/dev community to ensure that we're developing the
features/support people are looking for.
Ceilometer:
I pretty much agree with everyone so far. No vendor booths, distributed
“underwriters”, modest registration fee, and sans evening event. Not sure
separate regional meetings are a good idea, but would be in favor of
alternating North America vs. other region, like the summits.
I’ve been
Tom,
In my opinion, we should not have booths at all. Actually, we should just only
have Operators attending this meetup with a limit of three attendees by
company. During the Philadelphia one I noticed that many of the attendees where
from the same company and I do not believe those companies
16 matches
Mail list logo
