Re: [Openstack-operators] CentOS 7 KVM and QEMU 2.+

2015-11-12 Thread JuanFra Rodríguez Cardoso
I agree with Erik! Source RPM packages from RH are a good option. Best, . JuanFra Rodríguez Cardoso jfrodrig...@keedio.com | +34 636 692 691 www.keedio.com . On

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops] tools-contrib repo review in

2015-11-12 Thread JJ Asghar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/12/15 3:36 PM, Mike Dorman wrote: > I guess I thought we were just going to create contrib/ directories in each > of the existing repos, rather than a net new repo. Note, our notes aren't great; but I remember someone saying something like

Re: [Openstack-operators] [eu] European Operators Meetup February 15th/16th 2016

2015-11-12 Thread David Medberry
Thanks to Canonical, Codethink, Midokura, DataCentred and the EU operators that got this going! Nicely done. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Matt Jarvis wrote: > Canonical, Codethink, Midokura and DataCentred ___

Re: [Openstack-operators] [puppet] Can we install OpenStack components using puppet but through source?

2015-11-12 Thread matt
i'd recommend using jenkins or some sort of packaging utility whatever or just python setuptools to create a venv of each of the components before using puppet to deploy them. -matt On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Okan bhan wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'm trying installing

[Openstack-operators] [puppet] Can we install OpenStack components using puppet but through source?

2015-11-12 Thread Okan bhan
Hi Guys, I'm trying installing OpenStack using puppet modules. I'm able to setup all-in-one installation for liberty release. This works fine but I was hoping, if there is a way I can install services (say keystone) from source code. Essentially I was hoping if I can use puppet to setup a

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] FYI, local conductor mode is deprecated, pending removal in N

2015-11-12 Thread Yaguang Tang
There are still performance issue in large deployment to use nova-conductor, how do we make this decision to deprecate local mode? I see the patch is merged only three days after submit. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Details are in the

[Openstack-operators] cinder-api with rbd driver ignores ceph.conf

2015-11-12 Thread Saverio Proto
Hello there, I am investigating why my cinder is slow deleting volumes. you might remember my email from few days ago with subject: "cinder volume_clear=zero makes sense with rbd ?" so it comes out that volume_clear has nothing to do with the rbd driver. cinder was not guilty, it was really

Re: [Openstack-operators] cinder-api with rbd driver ignores ceph.conf

2015-11-12 Thread Saverio Proto
So here is my best guess. Could be that I am missing this patch ? https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/6211d8fa2033c2a607c20667110c5913cf60dd53 proto@controller:~$ apt-cache policy python-cinder python-cinder: Installed: 1:2014.2.3-0ubuntu1.1~cloud0 Candidate:

Re: [Openstack-operators] CentOS 7 KVM and QEMU 2.+

2015-11-12 Thread Marc Heckmann
Hello, On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 16:54 +, Leslie-Alexandre DENIS wrote: > Hello guys, > > I'm struggling at finding a qemu(-kvm) version up-to-date for CentOS 7 with > official repositories > and additional EPEL. > > Currently the only package named qemu-kvm in these repositories is >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [Large Deployments Team] [nova] Cells v1 attach/detach blueprint

2015-11-12 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/11/2015 4:12 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 11/11/2015 11:28 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: On 11/10/15 at 06:50pm, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 11/10/2015 4:42 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: On 2015-11-10 5:18 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: It should be noted that cells v1 doesn't support the

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] FYI, local conductor mode is deprecated, pending removal in N

2015-11-12 Thread Mike Dorman
We do have a backlog story to investigate this more deeply, we just have not had the time to do it yet. For us, it’s been easier/faster to add more hardware to conductor to get over the hump temporarily. We kind of have that work earmarked for after the Liberty upgrade, in hopes that maybe

Re: [Openstack-operators] cinder-api with rbd driver ignores ceph.conf

2015-11-12 Thread Josh Durgin
On 11/12/2015 07:41 AM, Saverio Proto wrote: So here is my best guess. Could be that I am missing this patch ? https://github.com/openstack/cinder/commit/6211d8fa2033c2a607c20667110c5913cf60dd53 Exactly, you need that patch for cinder to use rbd_default_features from ceph.conf instead of its

Re: [Openstack-operators] CentOS 7 KVM and QEMU 2.+

2015-11-12 Thread Arne Wiebalck
Hi, What about the CentOS Virt SIG’s repo at http://mirror.centos.org/centos-7/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ (and the testing repos at: http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ )? These contain newer versions of the qemu-* packages. Cheers, Arne — Arne Wiebalck CERN IT >

Re: [Openstack-operators] CentOS 7 KVM and QEMU 2.+

2015-11-12 Thread Erik McCormick
I've been building these and running them on CentOS for a while, mainly to get RBD support. They work fine. http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/ On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Arne Wiebalck wrote: > Hi, > > What about the CentOS

[Openstack-operators] Neutron Firewall as a Service

2015-11-12 Thread Sean M. Collins
Hello Operators! Similar to the post that Kyle sent to this list about the VPNaaS[1] API in Neutron, I would like to survey the operators to see who is currently using the Firewall as a Service API. Recently, a new core team was appointed, with a mission to gather requirements[2], determine the

[Openstack-operators] Problem configuring a second external network

2015-11-12 Thread Davíð Örn Jóhannsson
We have an external network (Internet) working and are trying to configure an additional external network (Intranet) >From the network nodes we can ping the gateway of the of the Intra network as >well as a router created on the external network. However the instances on the private

[Openstack-operators] CentOS 7 KVM and QEMU 2.+

2015-11-12 Thread Leslie-Alexandre DENIS
Hello guys, I'm struggling at finding a qemu(-kvm) version up-to-date for CentOS 7 with official repositories and additional EPEL. Currently the only package named qemu-kvm in these repositories is *qemu-kvm-1.5.3-86.el7_1.8.x86_64*, which is a bit outdated. As what I understand QEMU merged

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] FYI, local conductor mode is deprecated, pending removal in N

2015-11-12 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/12/2015 8:15 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: On 11/12/15 at 09:31pm, Yaguang Tang wrote: There are still performance issue in large deployment to use nova-conductor, how do we make this decision to deprecate local mode? I see the patch is merged only three days after submit. There is no

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] FYI, local conductor mode is deprecated, pending removal in N

2015-11-12 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-11-12 10:35:21 -0800: > Mike Dorman wrote: > > We do have a backlog story to investigate this more deeply, we just have > > not had the time to do it yet. For us, it’s been easier/faster to add more > > hardware to conductor to get over the hump

Re: [Openstack-operators] [nova] FYI, local conductor mode is deprecated, pending removal in N

2015-11-12 Thread Joshua Harlow
Ok, so the following is starting to form: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/remote-conductor-performance Hopefully we can get to the bottom of this (especially for clouds that run a large amount of computes in a single cell/only one cell). Andrew Laski wrote: On 11/12/15 at 10:53am, Clint