Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I think it's good to move the meeting around out of fairness. Although like you said, I would not be able to justify travel expenses for my staff (US-based) for a mid-cycle meetup. -Original Message- From: Jonathan Proulx [mailto:j...@csail.mit.edu] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:51

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Let me restate the question a bit as I think I'm hearing two different responses that may be getting conflated. Option 1: There's a single Ops Midcycle that shifts around and we look at ways to increase remote participation. (obviously this doesn't preclude other meetups) Option 2: There are

Re: [Openstack-operators] cinder-api with rbd driver ignores ceph.conf

Thanks, I tried to backport this patch to Juno but it is not that trivial for me. I have 2 tests failing, about volume cloning and create a volume without layering. https://github.com/zioproto/cinder/commit/0d26cae585f54c7bda5ba5b423d8d9ddc87e0b34

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I thought we were working toward a regional approach rather than having an "official" single meetup. Are you proposing to scrap the North America meetup entirely? What does official vs. unofficial entail? -Erik On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > Hi

[Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Hi All, 1st User Committee IRC meeting will be today at 19:00UTC on #openstack-meeting, we haven't exactly settled on an agenda yet but I hope to raise this issue the... It has been suggested that we make the February 15-16 European Ops Meetup in Manchester UK [1] the 'official' OPs Midcycle.

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Sorry, late to the conversation and maybe missing a bit of context. How may regional meetings are we thinking? 2-3? Or more? Piet Piet Kruithof Sr UX Architect, HP Helion Cloud PTL, OpenStack UX project "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat and wrong.” H L

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Multiple meetups in parallel does make it more difficult to get the PTLs and product working group involved. There have been many benefits from their work with operators and defining the roadmaps. It may be that not everyone can attend but there is also the opportunity for those who have

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

OK - thanks! It actually works for the OpenStack UX team because we have folks in most of those regions that would be able to attend. It¹s worth noting that we should be consistent in how the operators are engaged during the meetings so that the team is able to generalize across regions. Piet

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:37:59AM -0700, Matt Fischer wrote: :I think that sticking with a singular official one is the plan. It's :difficult enough for the foundation to line up sponsors/hosts etc for a :single meet-up. Thanks for bring that up. I was just wondering howmuch Foundation

[Openstack-operators] Fwd: OPs Midcycle location discussion.

For us NZ (and maybe Aus) folk to attend, getting to Europe is (literally) twice the distance of US, but Asia is about the same (language aside).I find the Summit really valuable in that a large and diverse group get together and the discussion is live, and in the same time zone - I'd be sad

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 04:55:33PM +, Kruithof, Piet wrote: :Sorry, late to the conversation and maybe missing a bit of context. : :How may regional meetings are we thinking? 2-3? Or more? My basic question was One or Many. If Many then that's a further question, but probably 3 (north

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I think that sticking with a singular official one is the plan. It's difficult enough for the foundation to line up sponsors/hosts etc for a single meet-up. I also think that there are some US/Asia folks that will attend a midcycle in Europe and by also hosting a competing one locally you may

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

+1 Option 1 On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > > Let me restate the question a bit as I think I'm hearing two different > responses that may be getting conflated. > > Option 1: There's a single Ops Midcycle that shifts around and we > look at ways to

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I’ll +1 option 1 too, if we can get remote participation that would suffice. From: Joe Topjian [mailto:j...@topjian.net] Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 12:57 PM To: Jonathan Proulx Cc: openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

I second Matt's opinion here. We would prefer a singular meeting, regardless of location. - jlk On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Matt Fischer wrote: > I think that sticking with a singular official one is the plan. It's > difficult enough for the foundation to line up

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: > > Let me restate the question a bit as I think I'm hearing two different > responses that may be getting conflated. > > Option 1: There's a single Ops Midcycle that shifts around and we > look at ways to increase

[Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops][tools-generic] Coding Standards/Coding Linters for tools-generic

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NOTE: I get what I'm about to propose will open a HUGE can of worms, but we need it, so I'll start the conversation. We had some initial discussion and thoughts on coding standards when we first started this project. It got shot down, but not

Re: [Openstack-operators] OPs Midcycle location discussion.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Shamail wrote: > Hi, > >> On Nov 16, 2015, at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Proulx wrote: >> >> >> Let me restate the question a bit as I think I'm hearing two different >> responses that may be getting conflated. >> >> Option 1:

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators][osops][tools-generic] Coding Standards/Coding Linters for tools-generic

I think it’s a good idea. I think scripts and such that don’t pass the listing tools can go into the contrib repos and if they get cleaned up then they can move over to the regular ones. I don’t actually like some of the PEP8 and bashate rules, but I’d rather have a consistent style than have

[Openstack-operators] how to manage multiple openstack regions(Juno)

We have large scale physical servers to manage depend on our services, and built multiple openstack env.(regions), does any one how to manage these individual openstacks in one operation portal?We developed our own UI for it(not horizon). Thanks a lot! Jeff